Of course it does, robbing a bank has a very high reward but so is the risk. With 90% of traders likely to lose money anyway, what is the point in increasing it to an almost certain 100% by using unregulated brokers?
Are you really saying that it is better to “Gamble” on using non regulated brokers and just hope that they are not criminals or engaged in malpractices to fleece their clients than use regulated brokers where doing so would result in criminal prosecutions and deposited money being protected?
It is very recent that everyone was getting spam emails about how easy it is to make money from forex with links to unregulated brokers that kept all the clients money, many of which came from Israel.
Last year I posted on this thread
CryptoCurrency Scam Adverts - Post Your Experiences Here the scam emails for Bitcoin which again all had links to unregulated brokers who kept all the money that people were sucked into getting involved with.
This simply cannot happen with regulated brokers without them being subject to major consequences.
Your posts show you clearly have a vested interest in pushing non regulated brokers so is that because you have a commercial interest in doing so?
It is also noticeable that many relatively new members of this site are also doing the same. All of you keep pushing the same unregulated brokers which probably means lots of multiple identity registrations with the same agenda.
Your quote:
is complete rubbish.
The front running by brokers in the Jan 15th 2015 CHF currency crisis where they were stalling their clients from being able to get out of trades resulted in many retail traders being compensated at a later date but only those that were using regulated brokers. One thing is certain there was no compensation for anyone using unregulated brokers who were doing the same thing.