timsk
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,721
- Likes
- 3,421
I've no idea - but I'd guess not. What I do know is what I'd do if Paul and admin' invite me to apply for the job and appoint me to the post. My manifesto would be along the lines of:thanks timsk
are they vetted? do the great and the good have to prove they have track records of successful trading?
if someone is making proven live calls and getting a good strike rate then for me it gets interesting what they have to say.
1) Have a cull. The Articles section is starting to mirror the main boards, IMO. It appears to be about quantity rather than quality, and the pearls to dross ratio is moving in the wrong direction. Less is more. Thinning out the content will stall the decline and, with luck, halt it completely. Much like a library, out of date stuff that nobody reads ought to be removed - like this article which is specific to the market in 2006:
T2W Day Trading & Forex Community
2) I would not publish anything that looks like it's the result of a Google search and merely a cut 'n' paste job from another site - especially those that are little more than a plug for said site.
3) Encourage many, many more contributions from T2W members. I read lots of stuff which, IMO, is worthy of inclusion in the Articles section and is better than much of the stuff that's already there, sourced from outside T2W. (Frugi did exactly this in my case when I initially posted the 'Trading Plan Template' on the main boards.)
4) Canvass the opinions of members to find out what articles they want. For example, do we really want more articles about exotic options strategies? My guess is not. Canvassing members' opinions will find out if I'm right - or wrong. Either way, it's a win win situation for T2W.
Doing the four things above will help to inject a bit of life into the section and make it more dynamic, meaningful and useful to the membership.
Tim.