IlIlIlIlI
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,111
- Likes
- 2,160
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edee9/edee914cdd67f982c293750f0943914a9890bf95" alt="southfront.org"
Who Stopped the War in Ukraine?
Written by Ted Snider. Originally published on AntiWar Up until now, the heated question has been about who is responsible...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18ea0/18ea07b2da2ba80905d61a86063935fde60b290d" alt="southfront.org"
Sounds great, but will it really help Russia's overall position?- Russian forces are closing in on Bakhmut city - with even the Western media noting the inevitability of Russia’s victory there;
Yes, in theory Bakhmut’s fall would open a corridor down the M03 highway to attack the strategically and symbolically important cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk 20 miles to the northwest. However, Russia’s ability to exploit that seems doubtful as other Russian forces previously threatening Slovyansk from the north (from Izium) and east (from Lyman) were driven out in September.
Perhaps Russia’s military is desperate to claim any sort of offensive victory at a time it’s mostly compelled to be on the defensive. Online, pro-Russian bloggers and propagandists excitedly seize on reports of progress towards Bakhmut, emphasizing the rosy news (from their perspective) amidst grim reports coming from all other fronts.
Anyone desperate enough to believe what a Ukrainian official says about Russian losses - or anything else about this war for that matter - is at serious risk of being extremely disappointed and will, almost certainly, end up losing 10oz of fine 999 silver!. . . Putin suffering major losses in southern regions says ukrainian official rate is about 1 to 6.5.
Put that into a trading context, CV.According to deepstatemap Russians advanced ~ 3 km in one month towards Bakhmut.
In the meantime Ukranians advanced ~ 30 km from Izium towards Kreminna.
I agree about the scarce importance of open farmland but Izium and Kupiansk are not open farmland, they are important nodes.Bakmut are what matters to them the most, at the expense of relatively larger losses of mostly open farmland with little or no strategic importance.
c_v,Total chaos, but Tim and Brian think these guys will make a difference. 🤣
The video, if true, shows how unlikely the new 300K conscripts will help Russia's effort and makes me feel sorry for them.Total chaos, but Tim and Brian think these guys will make a difference. 🤣
Yeah, and a lot of the planners have been rewarded with different forms of early retirement (some less pleasant than others).🙄One thing everyone must surely agree on about the Russians is that they are patient, plan meticulously and don't do anything without sound military reasons.
After a long string of failures and few significant victories, the knives now seem to be out for Russian generals, amid criticism from prominent Russian military correspondents, state television propagandists and even members of the normally obedient parliament.
They are not conscripts, they are resservists.The video, if true, shows how unlikely the new 300K conscripts will help Russia's effort and makes me feel sorry for them.
R_L,The video, if true, shows how unlikely the new 300K conscripts will help Russia's effort and makes me feel sorry for them.
Well R_L, that's your interpretation. Again, you're just speculating, as you can't have any idea why the generals were relieved of their posts - if indeed they were. Perhaps they were simply due for retirement and the WP article is mere western propaganda. Who knows. And even if the generals weren't quite up to the job - for whatever reason - then they're replaced by someone who is. Are you suggesting that Zelensky hasn't done the same? You'll have seen - and will see again in the coming weeks - this very same process taking place within the British Conservative party!Yeah, and a lot of the planners have been rewarded with different forms of early retirement (some less pleasant than others).🙄