uk tax laws on forex

Random is absolutely correct in his assessment of the tax situation. If you are trading in the same sense as any other trade and fulfil the badges of trade then you will be liable to income tax and Class 4 NIC and you should register for Class 2 NIC if your profits in a tax year exceed £5k.


If you don't put any money aside for tax/NIC as soon as you start making money then the first tax return will hurt as you will have to pay all of the tax/NIC due on the first return plus 50% on account for the next year, so in effect 150% will be due.

The taxes due will be for the accounting period which ends in the tax year, with the money being due on 31st January following the end of the tax year. You have some scope to play around with the accounting period as you can choose when this is in your first year and it doesn't have to be either the first 12 months of trading or the tax year. You may also find you are paying extra tax on the 2nd return depending upon when your AP ends. The rules on it are too complex for me to explain but after 3 years it will always level out and any extra tax paid will be credited in your last year of trading.

The cashflow situation is somewhat better with a ltd co as you first corporation tax bill (20% of profits) is due 21 months after you start trading and is for the first 12 months only with no payments on account. Of course if you take dividends and haven't done sufficient planning to avoid higher rate tax, then the the additional tax due on the net dividends (another 25%) is due in the same way as trading profits, ie via self assessment with payments on account each year.

If the accountant Bootsy saw specialises in trading, then I doubt very much whether the advice he was given was the same as what he posted. Trading may be subject to either CGT or Income Tax depending upon a variety of factors (ie the badges of trade). You don't get a choice in the matter.

If the accountant has told you that you will only be liable to tax if it is your sole income then that is a very dangerous oversimplification of the situation, and if they have said cart blanche that the tax you will be liable for is CGT then I would suggest you go to another accountant, or preferably a tax adviser who would know a lot more about this than an accountant.

Absolute rubbish, this all depends on whether/how you are classifying the enterprise. Random has mentioned two ways, sole trader or a corporation. You cant then start spouting about class 4 or class 2 NI until you define this enterprise.
And its also pretty damn easy to convince HMRC whether its not your sole income. Show him your P60.
 
Absolute rubbish, this all depends on whether/how you are classifying the enterprise. Random has mentioned two ways, sole trader or a corporation. You cant then start spouting about class 4 or class 2 NI until you define this enterprise.
And its also pretty damn easy to convince HMRC whether its not your sole income. Show him your P60.

I'm not quite sure what you think is rubbish.

As I explained Class 2 & 4 NIC and income tax are paid by sole traders and Corporation Tax is paid by limited companies. You don't pay any NIC on dividends but you may have a liability to further income tax if you are a higher rate tax payer.

As for the reference to the P60 I am at a complete loss as to it's relevance. A P60 only shows PAYE earnings for the year, and does not show any other income source.

Having earnings which are taxed via PAYE does not preclude your activities from being classed as trade. I have several clients who have both PAYE and self employed earnings.
 
Thanks to all the contributors of the thread,
i have nt quite had chance to read all yet - so maybe this has already been discussed - but is there any way trading income can be taxed as in the "Jimmy Carr" and "Take That" (sorry, giving nothing) tax bands and schemes

What Jimmy Carr Can Teach You About Tax Avoidance | money.co.uk

Trading income, quite simply, if spreadbetting and is not your sole source of income is tax free. you dont need to even think about NI. You will already be paying NI on your job, you dont pay it again. Any other gains, if not spreadbetting will be subject to CGT and you have an annual allowance of 18k. Dead simple. Earn over 18k, you start paying tax on the excess.
 
Hmmm

So if it's your sole source of income. You will pay tax. Do you pay CGT or income tax+NI. And if it's the income tax route you can offset your working from home expenses.

Thus if your making 50+ trades a week. Your betting of going DMA and dropping spread betting as DMA will be cheaper.
 
Trading income, quite simply, if spreadbetting and is not your sole source of income is tax free. you dont need to even think about NI. You will already be paying NI on your job, you dont pay it again. Any other gains, if not spreadbetting will be subject to CGT and you have an annual allowance of 18k. Dead simple. Earn over 18k, you start paying tax on the excess.

If you think that this matter is dead simple then you clearly have not studied the relevant legislation, case law and HMRC guidance and in this area.

As a starting point you might want to look on HMRC's website, and whilst you are there take a look at the CGT section and you will find that the annual exemption is £10,600 per year not £18k.

Like most areas of tax it is not dead simple. It seems to me that some people have formed their opinions based upon a collection of second hand advice, urban myths and various other unreliable sources.

I have outlined in previous posts what the various situations could be and the ultimate decision as to what tax you will pay will provisionally be made by HMRC.

If, according to them, you get it wrong then there will be resultant penalties and fines and it will be up to you to take it to the First Tier Tribunal to challenge their decision if you have the grounds, time and funds to do so.

With regards to tax mitigation, there are numerous different schemes and methods that can be utilised to minimise your tax liabilities. Generally speaking because of the fees involved it's not worth doing unless you are facing higher rate tax liabilities. Many of the providers will have minimum amounts that are generally around £100k although some will be as low as £50k.

Good old fashioned low risk tax planning with a good tax adviser / IFA can keep you within the basic rate band, and if it can't because you earn too much then it might be worth looking at alternative schemes.

Generally speaking the only people who pay more than a small amount of tax at higher rates are those who haven't planned for it or those who want to pay it.
 
compound3;2047512]If you think that this matter is dead simple then you clearly have not studied the relevant legislation, case law and HMRC guidance and in this area.
I have actually, and being an ex accountant I'm pretty comfortable around that area. Unfortunately, HMRC does not actually have that much guidance.

As a starting point you might want to look on HMRC's website, and whilst you are there take a look at the CGT section and you will find that the annual exemption is £10,600 per year not £18k
Indeed, you're quite right, I cant think why I mentioned 18...thats the rate. So thanks for correcting me.

I have outlined in previous posts what the various situations could be and the ultimate decision as to what tax you will pay will provisionally be made by HMRC.
The trouble is you mentioned NI. And straight away that rang alarm bells being an ex accountant, and a business owner..the words every corporation (I think they your words) needs to pay NI. So I know categorically thats bollox, I didnt read much further but your advice on seeking advice is a good one

Will we clear it up here, highly unlikely as too many factors come into play, and this topic keeps on coming up time and time again. For me, its simple. As soon as you bring corporations, be that limited liabilty or sole traders or partnerships you start to muddy the water..as well as your age, marital status etc which all have a bearing.
 
I have actually, and being an ex accountant I'm pretty comfortable around that area. Unfortunately, HMRC does not actually have that much guidance.


Indeed, you're quite right, I cant think why I mentioned 18...thats the rate. So thanks for correcting me.


The trouble is you mentioned NI. And straight away that rang alarm bells being an ex accountant, and a business owner..the words every corporation (I think they your words) needs to pay NI. So I know categorically thats bollox, I didnt read much further but your advice on seeking advice is a good one

Will we clear it up here, highly unlikely as too many factors come into play, and this topic keeps on coming up time and time again. For me, its simple. As soon as you bring corporations, be that limited liabilty or sole traders or partnerships you start to muddy the water..as well as your age, marital status etc which all have a bearing.

To be fair, I think you were a bit aggressive Malaguti - I didn't see Compound saying anything about NI due by corporations?? As I'm sure you know, employer's NI (on the company) can fall due if you were to pay yourself a salary over the lower limit, but that would be an odd thing to do if you did opt for a company (though it's extremely common to pay yourself a small salary to increase company expenses and thus reduce corporation tax, but not incur personal tax or NI).

I thought they were decent posts that went into more detail than my own - it's very difficult to get comprehensive tax advice for free and he addressed this admirably.
 
I have actually, and being an ex accountant I'm pretty comfortable around that area. Unfortunately, HMRC does not actually have that much guidance.


Indeed, you're quite right, I cant think why I mentioned 18...thats the rate. So thanks for correcting me.


The trouble is you mentioned NI. And straight away that rang alarm bells being an ex accountant, and a business owner..the words every corporation (I think they your words) needs to pay NI. So I know categorically thats bollox, I didnt read much further but your advice on seeking advice is a good one.

Will we clear it up here, highly unlikely as too many factors come into play, and this topic keeps on coming up time and time again. For me, its simple. As soon as you bring corporations, be that limited liabilty or sole traders or partnerships you start to muddy the water..as well as your age, marital status etc which all have a bearing.

You are absolutely correct about there being little direct guidance from HMRC concerning forex trading which is why this matter is not dead simple.

CFDs are an asset in the same way as shares, silver bullion, land, toilet rolls and paper mills are. If you know your case law then you will know that the buying and selling of all of the above assets have led to court decisions in favour of HMRC who viewed the transactions as a trading activity and not capital gains.

The facts of the case are paramount in deciding what tax treatment will be adopted by HMRC / the courts and whilst one person may be liable to CGT on their forex trades, another person might be considered to be carrying on a trade and be subject to Income Tax and National Insurance.

With regards to spreadbetting, the legal position is that it is only taxable if it is carried on as part of a trade such as a bookie mitigating risk on their positions or companies hedging against currency/commodity fluctuations. The principle in Graham v Green that a person having a system does not make the process of betting a trade has yet to be overturned either by the courts or through primary legislation.

In reality, HMRC don't like people who don't pay tax so individual inspectors / offices will send out assessments to people together with threats of penalties/interest etc. To my knowledge all of these have been settled out of court as fighting HMRC through the courts is an expensive and time consuming hobby.

What we need is another Geoff Jones who is prepared to fight it all the way and win to give everyone certainty on the matter. It would be interesting to see such a case go to court though, because it will be a case that HMRC will lose no matter what the judgement is. If they lose then they lose, but if they win then it could open up the floodgates for claims of sideways relief from the thousands of people who have lost money spreadbetting and have other income to set the losses off against.
 
You are absolutely correct about there being little direct guidance from HMRC concerning forex trading which is why this matter is not dead simple.

CFDs are an asset in the same way as shares, silver bullion, land, toilet rolls and paper mills are. If you know your case law then you will know that the buying and selling of all of the above assets have led to court decisions in favour of HMRC who viewed the transactions as a trading activity and not capital gains.

The facts of the case are paramount in deciding what tax treatment will be adopted by HMRC / the courts and whilst one person may be liable to CGT on their forex trades, another person might be considered to be carrying on a trade and be subject to Income Tax and National Insurance.

With regards to spreadbetting, the legal position is that it is only taxable if it is carried on as part of a trade such as a bookie mitigating risk on their positions or companies hedging against currency/commodity fluctuations. The principle in Graham v Green that a person having a system does not make the process of betting a trade has yet to be overturned in the courts.

In reality, HMRC don't like people who don't pay tax so individual inspectors / offices will send out assessments to people together with threats of penalties/interest etc. To my knowledge all of these have been settled out of court as fighting HMRC through the courts is an expensive and time consuming hobby.

What we need is another Geoff Jones who is prepared to fight it all the way and win to give everyone certainty on the matter. It would be interesting to see such a case go to court though, because it will be a case that HMRC will lose no matter what the judgement is. If they lose then they lose, but if they win then it could open up the floodgates for claims of sideways relief from the thousands of people who have lost money spreadbetting and have other income to set the losses off against.

Agreed - when I stopped paying PAYE they came after me within a year and I settled with HMRC amicably re my spreadbetting gains - unlike the IRS they are not a quasi executive power and quite reasonable (the IRS will put a lien on your house and bank account if you mess them about, I guess it comes with trying to pay for a spendy spendy country with woefully insufficient tax rates....).

Actually a little too reasonable... see Vodafone.

And as you say, the loss to the exchequer of allowing spread betting losses would be much more than the gain with actively taxing the profits... I don't see HMRC ever pursuing this publicly.
 
Agreed - when I stopped paying PAYE they came after me within a year and I settled with HMRC amicably re my spreadbetting gains - unlike the IRS they are not a quasi executive power and quite reasonable (the IRS will put a lien on your house and bank account if you mess them about, I guess it comes with trying to pay for a spendy spendy country with woefully insufficient tax rates....).

Actually a little too reasonable... see Vodafone.

And as you say, the loss to the exchequer of allowing spread betting losses would be much more than the gain with actively taxing the profits... I don't see HMRC ever pursuing this publicly.

I've not had any experience with the IRS so can't make any direct comparisons, but HMRC have been getting more and more hard nosed in recent years and will often try to operate beyond their powers or what the law is just to get more revenue in.

As you have experienced, if you stop paying tax then they are likely to investigate as to what your source of income is and to try and make you pay some form of tax, but that doesn't alter the legal position.

Depending upon the money involved, it is often cheaper to settle and pay some tax rather than fight it through the courts as you can often spend more money on legal bills than the tax that is due.

HMRC play on this fact which is why they will make assessments that have spurious legal grounds as they know the majority of people will pay it. It's bully boy tactics pure and simple and makes a mockery of the legal system.

I look forward to them getting their fingers burned one day if someone did decide that the principle was more important than the money involved and took it to court. For all we know though, this may have already happened and HMRC may have withdrawn the claim before it went to court.
 
So to summarise.

HMRC take the ****, knowing people can't afford to challenge or just won't bother. You pay tax on winnings and if you lose, you can't offset. WTF.

Best getting an individual decision in writing and going public.

I can understand people making a fortune and not paying any tax rubbing them up the wrong way. But it's either gambling or not. A test case is needed. But I suppose most just don't report any mayor gains and evade.
 
You've summed up the situation pretty well. They want to have their cake and eat it.

HMRC will gladly chase after all of those minority of traders who make good money and try and get them to pay income tax on their winnings, but if you are one of the majority who have lost money, then your claim for loss relief will be refused.

Trying to get HMRC to put any decision in writing is very difficult and even if they do, it will be extremely narrow and only binding on the person it refers to, so wouldn't do much good to anyone else.

A test case would be very useful but not likely. Test cases are generally brought either by cases which involve an awful lot of money such as the Rangers EBT, or by the outraged tax payer who refuses to back down even when it makes economic sense to do so.
 
Seems best to declare and hope for a good decision. No point using SB'ers if your paying tax on winnings.
 
My advice would be to start by using a spreadbetting account rather than an ECN. Learn the ropes and experience the different market conditions in a controlled manner. Don't run before you can walk. Aim to break-even (I know it sounds boring!) in the first couple of months. Capital Spreads or Dealing Desk are your best bet.

Worry about tax once you've made £50k spreadbetting.

Good Luck!

Steve.

Can you please give me some info on " penshioner having permanent source of income by receiving penshion for a living-----also engaged full time in spreadbetting forex" and making a gain pounds 40 a day on average.

How his gains are treated for tax purposes. I have looked extensively on sites and found no mention specifically treatment towards pensioners whose guaranteed source of income is already met by pension.
 
Can you please give me some info on " penshioner having permanent source of income by receiving penshion for a living-----also engaged full time in spreadbetting forex" and making a gain pounds 40 a day on average.

How his gains are treated for tax purposes. I have looked extensively on sites and found no mention specifically treatment towards pensioners whose guaranteed source of income is already met by pension.

The only grey area seems to be if it's your sole source of income.

There is an extensive thread on UK tax in the spread betting forum you might like to read.

http://www.trade2win.com/boards/spread-betting-cfds/142490-tax.html
 
There are 1000 threads on this. Profits from spreadbetting are tax free. Losses from spreadbetting cant be used to offset other sources of income.

A friend of mine has a letter from HMRC stating that his 7 figure spreadbetting (sole) income in not taxable.

Same for pensioner. You are gambling, you are spreadbetting, it is non taxable and your losses cant be offset against other income, ie. your pension.
 
Ahem to that D70.

When I said grey area I meant that some people have had pressure applied by HMRC, rolled over and paid when it was their sole source of income. As reported on this very thread.
 
Ahem to that D70.

When I said grey area I meant that some people have had pressure applied by HMRC, rolled over and paid when it was their sole source of income. As reported on this very thread.

'Pressure applied' really? By HMRC ?

You either owe tax or you dont.
 
Top