You can say that again! I assumed I'd read it over a day or two in addition to everything else I normally do, with no problem at all, but somehow it just doesn't quite work out like that! Hope you enjoy it, Jonny.JonnyT said:It sure is going to take some reading.
You can use what you learn in this book with, or without, any particular software at all. The book is about a method of trading that the author has been using since the days before computers.pratbh said:Nobody seems to have answered mik1973's question on page 4 yet, so let me ask again:Can this book be used with Sharescope EOD? Has anyone done it yet? The book might be very good, but if I can't use it with my existing software then I have to give it a miss.
JonnyT said:However reading the charts is an art...
Roberto said:You can use what you learn in this book with, or without, any particular software at all. The book is about a method of trading that the author has been using since the days before computers.
If you're asking whether the specific indicators he refers to throughout the book can be programmed into Sharescope EOD, I have no idea. But it wouldn't affect the generality of anything even if it couldn't. As the author explains in some detail in the book, it's not the particular indicators which he happens to use that are the point at all.
Sorry if this _still_ doesn't answer the question, but with respect, I think the question may be assuming something (i.e. that what's being offered is a specific and detailed trading system dependent on the availability of a specific and detailed indicator) that simply isn't the case.
s-a said:DESKPRO,
Try to be less concerned with a specific entry and more concerned with how you exit. This is easily illustrated by how I can use my random entry strategy and then apply a range of exits and still be profitable over many trades. The exits are what is more important, not the entry in my strong opinion. I've tested this out on 5 years of FX data across 7 pairs and in all cases they where profitable over many trades. Now this is just a random entry always in the market strategy. Using an entry with some sort of smarts behind it should fair better IMHO.
As for stops, he does say he places his stops based on the charting landscape. He looks for points where the price would turn the line pattern against his either bullish or bearish status. He includes neutral status as a point where a stop will reside. Makes good sense to me.
HG
TGM said:Kevin546,
A couple guys keep asking about entry. When a market first goes concurrent get in! In the book he mentions quite clearly that you should unchanged or better the next day. If after the first hour you are not filled ----cancel the order and go with a market order. If the trend has developed ---wait for 2 days against the trend. This is all the book. The market (any market) will seldom (if ever) go more than 4 days against the trend. He gives a handful of ideas and examples of this..
DESKPRO said:Dont get me wrong I found the book very interesting... think you hit the nail on the head when-you said that get in when the market first goes concurrent but this is easily said then done. Bit confused when you say that if not filled wait for the market to go against the trend... if this does happen surely the indicators will be pointing to a low probability trade. ie score of less than 2.5 or -2.5