robster970
Guest Author
- Messages
- 4,567
- Likes
- 1,390
More art than science.
Ditto.
More art than science.
Science.
Unless you define any of the below as Art.
Economies, Resources, Energy, Logistics, Technology, People, Property, History, Logic, Psychology, Politics, Law, Geography, Probabilities.
Science.
Unless you define any of the below as Art.
Economies, Resources, Energy, Logistics, Technology, People, Property, History, Logic, Psychology, Politics, Law, Geography, Probabilities.
Why must it be either/or? I want it all. Its Science AND Art.
It is a balance of both Art and Science, where (Art + Science) = 100.
All trading patterns have detailed rules about entries and exits, etc.
But, the reality seems to be that profit is about getting in as the patterns form, unfold.
By the time the pattern completes, the optimal entry has been missed.
So, the Science of Head and Shoulders, is recognising the Shoulder and Head, but the Art is judging the forming of the Shoulder to enter.
Breakouts are the Science. But, judging the validity, or judging how to assess the power and confirmation or rejection of the move is the Art.
Why must it be either/or? I want it all. Its Science AND Art.
Your post make sense to me because it made me think:
Is there Art involved in the knowledge or application of Science?
Your post make sense to me because it made me think:
Is there Art involved in the knowledge or application of Science?
There is speculation in science.