I really don't understand why everyone is so negative about the test.
ZOMG traders don't need to be maths genius, this test is stoopid
If you are running a company and need to recruit 10 people, you receive 10,000 applications but only have the capacity to interview 100 people; how would you screen the candidates?
Banks (in the UK) focus their screening by just targeting graduates from the top 6 (or 4) universities. The likes of Tibra and Optiver focus their screening by targeting only the most mentally dexterous.
A company like Tibra that trades its own capital does not rely on clients and investors like a bank. Their biggest asset is their technology, and more importantly training and retaining the brightest individuals available. Just because you scalp FX in your spare time for a decent profit does not mean you have more potential than someone who doesn't, nor does it mean you are what Tibra is looking for. I wouldn't imagine that they are looking for people keen to trade on their own (obviously an assumption), who are likely to leave the company much sooner (another assumption).
Are people really suggesting that they would assess each of the 10,000 candidates on a case-by-case basis? If you think this is viable then there is something very wrong with you.
A few people on here have come across quite hysterical, slating the test but not providing any solution to the screening problem.
I suppose it's easy for me to say this having passed the tests. I could be back on here this time next week moaning about the HR interview though
N.B. Any tips for the HR interview will be appreciated