Maybe I should have started this thread under the "Irony" one in the foyer.
My point was, these jihadists are allegedly possibly uncomfortable with casual sex and binge drinking yet have no problem accommodating gratuitous beheading.
Maybe I should have started this thread under the "Irony" one in the foyer.
My point was, these jihadists are allegedly possibly uncomfortable with casual sex and binge drinking yet have no problem accommodating gratuitous beheading.
Anybody notice BBC announces ISIS as militants and not terrorists? Weren't they called geurillas in the past?
I think the media and Hollywood have to accept they are partly to blame for this increase in the perception of violence. Decent people spent centuries trying to make life less cruel and violent just to be overturned in the pursuit of greedy money- grubbers. Without the oxygen of publicity many of the violent extremist groups would fizzle out !
Bring back the censors imho
Yes, the BBC has become increasingly liberal over the years. I remember the days when they used to refer to the likes of Derek Hatton as militant. Can't recall him beheading anyone though, but who knows...
Yes very interesting subtleties of language. Left wing militants is how I remember them.
I thought Obama's speech on ISIS was very well spoken with great ambiguity. The Guardian translates it well.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/11/obama-isis-speech-problems-key-points-mean
When I first heard this I thought - hang on a minute you are saying you'll destroy ISIS with counter-terrorism but at no point is ISIS labelled a terrorist organisation by the US state department. Need an interpreter for this one.
What Obama said:“Our objective is clear: we will degrade and ultimately destroy Isil through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.”
What it really means: Alas, it’s not a clear objective. It depends on where you put the emphasis – degrading or destroying. Obama has phrased missions like this before to avoid over-promising: famously, with his 2009 “disrupt, dismantle and defeat” objective against al-Qaida. How does the US know when its job is finished? Will Isis still exist in some diminished form at its end? Will Isis hold any territory at all? How “ultimately” is ultimately, and will that “ultimate” destruction occur before or after the US stops lobbing missiles? And so forth.
:whistling
Obama, admitted that the US had no strategy, just a few weeks ago. There's probably a good reason for this, the obvious being that the current crisis is basically as old as islam. So what do you do?
I see the current stuff (not crises) as battle for remaining oil. Black gold makes the world go round...
Give it another 20 years.
The CIA has apparently upped the numbers estimated for the jihadis from 10,000 to 30,000 - 40,000 !
The number of sleeper cells in the West wasn't disclosed but probably in the 100s.
By the time the Western leaders wake up to the extent of the problem a lot of damage may have been done already.
Better brace yer selves guys !! They aren't joking.
Never been there but sounds like a blessed relief.A mate grew up in qatar and said everyone had a bar in their house. There were just no pubs, and refreshingly prob one of the few places on earth which didnt have an irish bar.
Not sure if any of the residents were serving guinness though.
Beheading was their darts equivalent.
Ah jaysus. You've only gone an given them an idea for their next video where they take out two hostages at the same time:-Beheading was their darts equivalent.