Terror......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#History

I think that Israel IS and always has been a major cause of tension in the middle east.

In the last century, the UK/USA/Israel alliance has been a major cause of tension in the middle east, since around/before the time when the state of israel was created in 1947. The UK/USA/Israeli relationship has been very strong throughout his time, with unwavering support for Israel mostly....
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#History

I think that Israel IS and always has been a major cause of tension in the middle east.

In the last century, the UK/USA/Israel alliance has been a major cause of tension in the middle east, since around/before the time when the state of israel was created in 1947. The UK/USA/Israeli relationship has been very strong throughout his time, with unwavering support for Israel mostly....

Between us, too, by the look of it:)

I agree with you, Israel/Palestine goes back much further than Iraq/Iran. But Atilla has shown that the latter conflict is a separate matter based on a border dispute. The US was no worse than Russia, France and the UK in the fact that a lot of money was made out of all this misery.

I found this

http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/ShalomIranIraq.html

Split
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#History

I think that Israel IS and always has been a major cause of tension in the middle east.

In the last century, the UK/USA/Israel alliance has been a major cause of tension in the middle east, since around/before the time when the state of israel was created in 1947. The UK/USA/Israeli relationship has been very strong throughout his time, with unwavering support for Israel mostly....

I don't think there is much doubt that.

In the last day or so I read that the US (or at least the Whitehouse) is planning to supply $20 billion worth of arms to Saudi Arabia and some other gulf states that were not named. At the same time they announced an increase in military aid to Israel of $30 billion over the next ten years.

Great stuff. Ensure every player in the region is armed up to the teeth. Threaten Iran sufficiently into really building a bomb. Light the touch paper and stand back.

You don't know whether to laugh or cry.
 
Alex Jones' News Sites Hit By Major Hack Attack

Prison Planet | July 29, 2007

"Infowars.com & Prison Planet.com suffered a major attack last night after it was hacked.

The perpetrators could be trolls acting in response to our article about Wikipedia censorship yesterday or they could be acting on behalf of all manner of government agencies that we have clashed with over the years.................".

".................We are under constant attack and attempts at censorship for the simple reason that we are having a massive effect.

We now call on our great readers to circulate our articles at an even greater intensity to counter the effort to stifle this information..........".

http://www.infowars.com/articles/alex/alex_jones_news_sites_hacked.htm
 
THE ISRAEL LOBBY (AIPAC) - A DANGER TO THE WORLD The suppressed number ONE blockbuster of Google's more... 'Movers and Shakers' list. (see ... all http://xrl.us/wajr) Americans, the stringpullers of the NWO don't want you to see this documentary!

This originally Dutch tv production features the Israel lobby (particularly AIPAC) in the USA. It contains interviews with John Mearsheimer, geo-strategist Lawrence Wilkerson, Richard Perle, historian and critic Tony Judt, John Hagee, former Congressman Earl Hilliard, Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, Michael Massing and Daniel Levy.

(The footage of Mahathir Mohamad (ex PM of Malaysia) and some other things in the introduction are additions)

http://www.livevideo.com/video/NewMindZ/1A7FF0C5768B46A6987D2770C8D29D3A/the-israel-lobby-aipac-a-d.aspx
 
Hi Atilla,

A great post. I think that you deserve to win the argument because of the time and thought put into it. I can't argue with your points 1 and 2 and concede defeat!

The problem is what to do today. Leave Iraq the way it is and get out?

Regards Split

Hi Splitlink, I don't see it as winning or losing the argument but just explain the events and showing the US for it's true colours. Ms Rice today said it perceives Iran as the biggest threat to US interests in the Middle East. Which is spot on in my opinion. Slightly different to saying it's a threat peace in the ME which is how it is normally quoted.

Thank you for your kind words and yes I would say we get our troops out of Iraq.

Regarding other Israel, I feel the Jews have suffered terribly over the centuries and even now they are so small in number. They hold influential positions because they work hard and contribute to societies they live in.

I don't think it makes any difference where you live or die. This thing about land is screwed up in my opinion. During the first world war, in the trenches we gassed each other to death. Now I can go to Berlin, by property become a German citizen and marry a good looking Helga and be happy forever after. Likewise they are welcome here. Makes you wonder why so many died in the most horrible grissly way.

I think Palestine and Israel will be the same in the years ahead. People will wonder once the oil runs out what the hell they were shelling and blowing each other up for?

On another video, they stated what I think in that Isreal provides strategic benefit to the US in controlling and influencing the ME. In the years ahead and perhaps even now as some have commented the support given to Israel may have become a strategic burden on US foreign policy.

In another 50 or 100 years from now US and Israel will be judged by historians as Hitler and Stalin and Saddam will be judged. Nobody gets away with murder. In one world or another one pays their dues. If it's not you now it will be your genes in the future.

It saddens me we can't live in peace when there is so much earth has to offer.

Let me put it this way. Think...

Imagine how good you would feel if you saved the life of another person who was about to drown or fall off a cliff.

Imagine how bad you would feel if you took the life of another person who was desparate and weak, because you wanted his shoes and clothes.

I'm probably sad and dissillusioned but so can life be at times.

Splitlink I think your zmag article is way off the mark too. But don't have the energy or the will to pick it to shreds.

I'll comment on one small paragraph.

The war began on September 22, 1980, when Iraqi troops launched a full-scale invasion of Iran. Prior to this date there had been subversion by each country inside the other and also major border clashes. Iraq hoped for a lightning victory against an internationally isolated neighbor in the throes of revolutionary upheaval. But despite Iraq's initial successes, the Iranians rallied and, using their much larger population, were able by mid-1982 to push the invaders out. In June 1982, the Iranians went over to the offensive, but Iraq, with a significant advantage in heavy weaponry, was able to prevent a decisive Iranian breakthrough. The guns finally fell silent on August 20, 1988.

That significant advantage was US satellite intelligence and chemical weapons supplied by Mrs Thatcher and & Co., with US full awareness and support.

Nice gloss.

The rest is a lot of bull and twist but as I say too worn out to piddle with rubbish. Telling lies and deceiving people.

I don't think Israel's lobby is a danger to the World. They are only trying to exist. I do hope some land for peace deal is brought about. As I say Jewish people have suffered for centuries and most of that time in the hands of Christians and Roman catholics. Israel is very small too.

I would also point out that with the money in the oil wells and the intelligence of the Jewish minds, that whole region could become paradise. Instead it's a hell hole.

If only people would see common sense and have compassion for ones fellow man. :cry:

Anybody notice how oil has gone up from $40 to almost $80? Wow.
 
Observations of threads about controversial topics...

Some of you guys are happy to discuss side issues with non-specific rambling, warbling, yawn-producing commentary on this thread, but the moment someone posts some good links to some credible, attention worthy topics, you completely ignore them, go quiet, and pretend they're not there, and even post around them. It makes me laugh........

I suppose the important thing is to become aware of the info. But then how can a person who has been made aware of the real issues then go back to spouting the same old...........:confused:

You're happy to write 1000 word essays that waffle on & on about your own BBC shaped opinion that don't even include 1 link to an external reference, but dare not even acknowledge or address the real issues...........

Rant over!!
 
Last edited:
We do work Monday to Friday, you know! Besides. I just got my balls shot off.:D

Split
 
"Imagine how good you would feel if you saved the life of another person who was about to drown or fall off a cliff.

Imagine how bad you would feel if you took the life of another person who was desparate and weak, because you wanted his shoes and clothes"

did this person owe me any money ?
 
Some of you guys are happy to discuss side issues with non-specific rambling, warbling, yawn-producing commentary on this thread, but the moment someone posts some good links to some credible, attention worthy topics, you completely ignore them, go quiet, and pretend they're not there, and even post around them. It makes me laugh........

I suppose the important thing is to become aware of the info. But then how can a person who has been made aware of the real issues then go back to spouting the same old...........:confused:

You're happy to write 1000 word essays that waffle on & on about your own BBC shaped opinion that don't even include 1 link to an external reference, but dare not even acknowledge or address the real issues...........

Rant over!!

the in-depth stuff is for the weekends.
rest of time, I think its mostly banter and passing the time in-between trades.
(good stuff, and the links are appreciated and read.)
 
Some of you guys are happy to discuss side issues with non-specific rambling, warbling, yawn-producing commentary on this thread, but the moment someone posts some good links to some credible, attention worthy topics, you completely ignore them, go quiet, and pretend they're not there, and even post around them. It makes me laugh........

I suppose the important thing is to become aware of the info. But then how can a person who has been made aware of the real issues then go back to spouting the same old...........:confused:

You're happy to write 1000 word essays that waffle on & on about your own BBC shaped opinion that don't even include 1 link to an external reference, but dare not even acknowledge or address the real issues...........

Rant over!!

PS.
I wan't being funny, or referring to any specific memers. Nor am i trying to get members to discuss topics they're not comfortable with.
The same thing occurred on the con. theory thread. i just find these phenomen interesting........

In any case, if all the alternative media coverage is conspiracy BS - as we are told in the mainstream.........perhaps we should feel free to discuss it openly :idea: :confused:
 
Any way, i said i would try & avoid this thread, but i found the temptation to post hard to resist.

However, as with the GW thread, i am now categorically saying that i am leaving the debate, and not posting any more to this thread!

Grazie, arrivederci!



"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Mark Twain

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
 
Some of you guys are happy to discuss side issues with non-specific rambling, warbling, yawn-producing commentary on this thread, but the moment someone posts some good links to some credible, attention worthy topics, you completely ignore them, go quiet, and pretend they're not there, and even post around them. It makes me laugh........

I suppose the important thing is to become aware of the info. But then how can a person who has been made aware of the real issues then go back to spouting the same old...........:confused:

You're happy to write 1000 word essays that waffle on & on about basically your own opinion that don't even include 1 link to an external reference, formed by what you know/remember of a situation from regurgitating BBC coverage, but dare not even acknowledge or address the real issues...........

Rant over!!

JTrader,

I'm really not sure what to say. I can't speak for anybody else here, but I'm quite aware that the "terrorist threat level" is frequently manufactured and a mostly sycophantic media duely performs is role.

I'm also quite aware that we could witness a "false flag" event that could be used as a pretext for a war with Iran, though I think it is more probable that some accidental incident could be siezed upon as an excuse. Some sort of deliberate provocation by the US or Israel is certainly not impossible.

I don't like conspiracy theories for a number of reasons. For a start they are bad politics. They are a liability and distraction for an anti-war movement that seeks to end the wars in the middle east. The big picture is everything and one does not need to subscribe to some conspiracy theory to vehemently oppose these wars.

I'll repeat it - the big picture is crucial. Militant Islam is very much a reaction to the actions and behavior of the US and it's fellow travellers in the Middle East. In particular, the plight of the Palestinians and US support for numerous authoritarian regeimes are the things that lit the fuse. Why has the reaction to the US imperial endeavours taken such a religious form ? My own view is that secular pan Arabic socialism failed the poeples of the middle east badly and degenerated into authoritarian, corrupt governments as exemplefied by the Bath party in Iraq and Fatah in Palestine. Contrast with Hamas and Hizbollah who, within their own frame of reference, have a large measure of integrity and have not succumbed to corruption. In a leadership void, Islamists seized the opportunity.

It is interesting to reflect upon the fact that for all the ridiculous talk of Islamo-Fascism, the US attacked Iraq then a secular state. The US is fundamentally not that worried about religion of any flavour. What it doesn't want to see is unifying nationalist movements or parties in the countries of the Middle east. It is why it constantly tries to undermine the growth of such in Iraq and it is why sectarian violence will go on for ever until the US gets out. The US wants Iraqis fighting each other (at a controllable level of course). Any other outcome is certain defeat for the US.

Arriving at an understanding of terrorism requires an understanding of some of these issues. While conspiracies may or may not be involved in the process of how we got to be where we are today, they are not the main driving force.

I also don't much like conspiracy theories because they a predicated on a very much US centric view of the world where things play out according to the machinations of faceless men in Wahington. The world is a bigger and more complex place than that and the people of the Middle East are actors on the stage of their own history just as much as those pulling the strings in Washington. Should the resistance to US occupation in Iraq not been so strong, it is quite probable that the US would have attacked Iran by now.
 
JTrader,

I'm really not sure what to say. I can't speak for anybody else here, but I'm quite aware that the "terrorist threat level" is frequently manufactured and a mostly sycophantic media duely performs is role.

I'm also quite aware that we could witness a "false flag" event that could be used as a pretext for a war with Iran, though I think it is more probable that some accidental incident could be siezed upon as an excuse. Some sort of deliberate provocation by the US or Israel is certainly not impossible.

I don't like conspiracy theories for a number of reasons. For a start they are bad politics. They are a liability and distraction for an anti-war movement that seeks to end the wars in the middle east. The big picture is everything and one does not need to subscribe to some conspiracy theory to vehemently oppose these wars.

I'll repeat it - the big picture is crucial. Militant Islam is very much a reaction to the actions and behavior of the US and it's fellow travellers in the Middle East. In particular, the plight of the Palestinians and US support for numerous authoritarian regeimes are the things that lit the fuse. Why has the reaction to the US imperial endeavours taken such a religious form ? My own view is that secular pan Arabic socialism failed the poeples of the middle east badly and degenerated into authoritarian, corrupt governments as exemplefied by the Bath party in Iraq and Fatah in Palestine. Contrast with Hamas and Hizbollah who, within their own frame of reference, have a large measure of integrity and have not succumbed to corruption. In a leadership void, Islamists seized the opportunity.

It is interesting to reflect upon the fact that for all the ridiculous talk of Islamo-Fascism, the US attacked Iraq then a secular state. The US is fundamentally not that worried about religion of any flavour. What it doesn't want to see is unifying nationalist movements or parties in the countries of the Middle east. It is why it constantly tries to undermine the growth of such in Iraq and it is why sectarian violence will go on for ever until the US gets out. The US wants Iraqis fighting each other (at a controllable level of course). Any other outcome is certain defeat for the US.

Arriving at an understanding of terrorism requires an understanding of some of these issues. While conspiracies may or may not be involved in the process of how we got to be where we are today, they are not the main driving force.

I also don't much like conspiracy theories because they a predicated on a very much US centric view of the world where things play out according to the machinations of faceless men in Wahington. The world is a bigger and more complex place than that and the people of the Middle East are actors on the stage of their own history just as much as those pulling the strings in Washington. Should the resistance to US occupation in Iraq not been so strong, it is quite probable that the US would have attacked Iran by now.


Hi DCraig,

I feel you are falling into the same mentality trap as Splitlink although I concur with your analysis with the exception of the Militant Islam bit. Islam is not millitant. It is a peaceful way of life in harmony with mother nature, the same way as promoted by Christianity and Judaism. Militant Islam is a contradiction in terms. Once again that's what the US would have you believe.

If you are talking about Jihad that's different. That is fighting to defend your self and lands when attacked. Even then there is small Jihad and big Jihad. War is small Jihad. Big Jihad is self discipline within your self.

Because the people that fight are believed to be muslims does not make Islam a militant religeon. Just as the Christian soldiers who fight in the ME don't make this the Crusades.

There was a big reaction in Latin America all through out the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s against the US. The US was against any socialist government. It put in place countless ruthless *******s fascists and generals and juntas and extreme right wing governments call it what you will with tortures, death rapes and assinations. Even nuns were raped and killed. There was a mighty strong reaction. Nobody said it was a Roman Catholic reaction that was driving socialism. Mans conscience. Same in Vietnam, Phillapines and many other places.

As previous blogs on this site show the US wants Osama bin Alive because it suits its cause. Most muslim friends of mine are against the terrorists and I believe them when they tell me so, but also the US because of it's foreign policies along with millions of other non-muslims.

Why is it that some idiots are believed over many others I have no idea. Like coverage given to Hamza or what ever the idiots name is and no coverage of decent muslims.

Why wasn't the wars in Northern Ireland describes as Protestants against Roman Catholics instead of IRA and Loyalists?

Why was the Serbs and Croats fighting Bosnian Muslims? Why why why always the same ****ing religious tie in to distinguish muslims. Why not Orthodox Christian Serbs and Catholic Croats and Bosnian Muslims. If you are going to make a distinction do it equaly.

Then people like Splitlink and you talk about Muslim problem and militant Islam.

These wars have nothing to do with religeon and that is the big lie. It's about power, weapons and oil.

You are partially right in my opinion about US deviding up Iraq. US wants Sunnis and Shias fighting each other whilst with the Kurds it syphons out the oil. Those Iraqi Kurds don't know it was Uncle Sam that perpertrated their decimation in the hands of the Shah and Saddam. Or they know but are too stupid or simply opportunists to get into bed with the US. They are now fighting for crumbs lead by war lords nothing more. Their leaders swiss bank accounts are bursting in their milions. The leaders know they can get away but when the US leaves what will happen to them living with their fellow arab cousins?

The US believes if it stays and holds out long enough, people who can't live without electricty and water and money will leave or just yield. They are at present given $15,000 to leave.

The problem is the cost of the war $600bn + is likely to outweigh the full value of the oil left in Iraq. Hence like a business comes the cost of is it worth it in money terms.

Also, if it were to open another front with Iran what would it gain? Would only crank up the cost.

At the end of the day, it's all about the oil and the money. Nothing else.

Militants do not represent Islam. Islam does not represent Militants.

Don't confuse terrorism with what it is.
 
Last edited:
Hi DCraig,

"I feel you are falling into the same mentality trap as Fibonelli although I concur with your analysis with the exception of the Militant Islam bit........".

"........Then people like Fibonelli and you talk about Muslim problem and militant Islam.......".

.

Atilla,

I am not happy about your latest epic post which you name me in it.

I am curious to know about this mentality trap label that you have appended to me. Please provide examples and your reasoning.

I don't recall talking about Muslim problem and militant islam. I don't ascribe to the view that there is a muslim problem. Please provide examples of my postings on this subject.

Cheers

Fibonelli
 
Atilla,

I am not happy about your latest epic post which you name me in it.

I am curious to know about this mentality trap label that you have appended to me. Please provide examples and your reasoning.

I don't recall talking about Muslim problem and militant islam. I don't ascribe to the view that there is a muslim problem. Please provide examples of my postings on this subject.

Cheers

Fibonelli

My apologies Fibonelli, it was Splitlink I was referring to.

I'll edit my posts..

Very sorry...


Mikey
 
Sunni's v al-Qaida?

Sunni's are now fighting againts US troops and al-Qaida...

This is old news and has been brewing for some time.

Think about it... What does it say about US troops and al-Qaida.

sniff sniff... Bad fishy smell going round... :rolleyes:
 
Top