tar
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,443
- Likes
- 1,314
Here's an analogy for you. Your house and your neighbours house get broken in to and you both get a lot of stuff stolen. The police catch the guys but only find their fingerprints in your neighbours house so they only get convicted for one burglary. You neighbour is able to make a claim for compensation against them and succeeds. You cant because they were not convicted of breaking into your house due to lack of evidence.
Therefore they do not have to give you a penny and that's fine by you? You think it would be childish for you to moan about that?
Totally different mate , in that case there is something stolen from me but there is no evidence , in the case of Fxcm the question is did they really steal from their UK clients according to the FSA rules ? it is not about the evidence here as there are track records and statements for all the transactions ...