This is absolutely correct, nothing worst than constant re-quotes, it is really a waste of time.having to click several times will rattle you and upset your rhythm.
not worth it.
This is absolutely correct, nothing worst than constant re-quotes, it is really a waste of time.having to click several times will rattle you and upset your rhythm.
not worth it.
If you are having a problem Ross Spur then please call us.
Regards
SLM
Are you just trying to wind people up on here or what?
Unlike other SBs, MT4 shows tics, so I think this theory could be checked by videoing some live trading, if anyone can be bothered.
I might have a go at an EA for something similar this week. All my orders entries are done by a script that will loop until the order is placed. It obviously writes to the journal if it gets invalid price or requote and then writes the price and time the order is placed at. If i put an EA on the chart that logs tick (time and price) it should be a simple case of comparing the journal to the EA output to see what direction price was moving in when the order gets filled or when it doesnt.
Thing is i already run an EA on all the charts for stop management so doing this might be a bit of a ball ache (unless i put the logging code in the stop management EA).
Call me paranoid, but my suspicion is that often you only get filled if the price immediately moves against you. Even if the price doesn't change you get an invalid message and requote. The amount that this happens seems to change from day to day, and not necessarily with market volativity, so possibly the platform is 'adjusted' as part of SLM's risk control?
Unlike other SBs, MT4 shows tics, so I think this theory could be checked by videoing some live trading, if anyone can be bothered.
You are a hard boiled fellow. Capital Spread works fine these days, the same goes for the other SB companies that initially have had platform problems. But in a sense I agree, one shouldn't waste too much time on these companies that doesn't deliver a good service. As you said there are a lot of good companies out there.Never give a firm a second chance...ever..
I cba, could you, it's a waste of time. You, me and the whole trading world know how the meta trader plug in works, no traders have to deal with a company who isn't stp/ndd/ECN.. I gave a heads up months back on this thread up as to how the plug in works, the reason an sb firm would choose to adopt meta trader for spread betting has nothing to do with being able to deliver the spread better a higher level of service, or more flexibility, it's simply an unmissable opportunity to queer the pitch..
Give it up, don't waste your energy, concentrate on what works for you, not what doesn't, there's plenty of firms out there doing the 'right thing' by their customers...Never give a firm a second chance...ever..
To any new readers try to take the repeated, constant moaning on this thread with a large pinch of salt. Anyone one who has so much trouble with a broker and continues to use them and moan, month after month, has an agenda.
I have traded with SLM for nine months full time and and very happy with both execution and customer service and frankly, I like Pauls no nonsense attitude to to some.
Maybe SLM suits swing traders, I don't use EAs, I don't scalp and I don't trade news, I don't have any complaints.
Presumably as a swing trader you enter and exit with orders a few times a week, in which case a few points lost here and there are of no significance. I find it hard to believe you haven't had invalid price messages when trying to enter or exit at market.
I didn't know any SB firm used MetaTrader. They seem to be quite a new firm. Anyone tried them yet?
Are they still doing 're-quotes'?
I think you miss the point Jaroon,
Just because your strategy doesnt depend on the accuracy and speed of execution, doesnt mean that you shouldn't expect it.