Sweepy, isn't the underlying problem twofold when trying to tame risk:
A: Nobody knows what is going to happen next,
and
B: Risk and Reward are correlated.
If that were not the case everybody would be making 800% year with a 0,5% drawdown.
;-)
So, in real life, no reward without exposure to risk.
And the size of your reward depends on the amount of risk you are willing to expose yourself to.
And if that amount is causing you sleepless nights, wasn't it one of the Market Wizards who recommended to then reduce your risk to your sleep-well levels.
Nothing much new here at all, but I'd always run away very quickly if some whiz kids promise you the keys to the moon, great returns with minimal risks, well, we've just seen what happened to the likes of LTCM or more recently certain no more independently operating banks that thought they had that non-existing holy grail cracked, right ?
As for hedges, well, they may protect your downside, but again at the cost of eating into your upside, so really provide you with no more than a similar situation to if you'd just been smaller from the outset.
Outright trading with options, well, unlike with futures your worst case scenario is clearly defined, but can you trade in and out with them with equal ease, low costs and speed intraday like with futures ?
I may be wrong here, but from what I've seen I believe options are only really a viable alternative to futures for longer term stuff where at a bare minimum your holding period would be at least several days.
Can't rep you mate, good post. Call me neanderthall man, but i don't use complex risk models, for me it's just a visual thingy, with an ear or two for the squawk.