SOCRATES
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,966
- Likes
- 136
You are absolutely correct in what you say, and I commend you for your clarity of expression.stevespray said:I personally think that sports arbitrage has to be approached in the same manner as trading for a living. I don’t think that it as simple as ‘earning a little bit of extra cash’. Obviously this is the message that companies advertising arbitrage services need to get across – their main selling points are the apparent ‘ease of earning easy money’. The reality is that it is not easy and the methods which are preached are full of potential pitfalls. I personally feel that the arbitrage services are no different to the people who peddle services which claim to predict easy profits within the markers. If people are so good at calling the markets then why do they mess about with their $99 per month subscription services ? Likewise, if there is plenty of room to make sports arbitrage bets then why do these companies not take advantage of their own information ? The fact that these two groups of people act in a certain way shows that they know where the real risk and the real rewards lie.
Steve.
If you add to this all these "systems" that purport to take the brainwork out of trading and offer signals and other nonsenses, plus the amount ot drivel that is published and discussed, it is no wonder that nearly everybody ends up being terribly confused.
This in part is the underlying reason why it is that so many people keep on asking so many questions, some of them silly and some not so silly, but, when the truth, in all its honest brutality freely offered, is presented to them, this is much more than they can allow themselves to accept, to my utter dismay and disbelief, and that of my peers.