People look too closely for straight parallels with the past instead of just trading what is in front of them. I've been guilty in the past as well.
Whilst events that are superficially similar invite such a response it should be evident that the outcomes are dependant upon how such events are managed,just like your trade. As such, exact parallels do not exist except as can be accounted for on a random basis.
At the moment what we can see is we are now dealing with a bigger range than we have had for some years hence the volatility whilst everybody guesses at what they can't yet see. We're in a range on dailies and above ,nothing more.Arguably we may be sideways ,but even that is a stretch at this point
What we are also seeing is straight linism. Whilst markets do make V turns (straight lines) most don't and long trends typically take months to years to make a confirmed turn which is far longer than the average attention span can tolerate without jumping to conclusions.
Whilst events that are superficially similar invite such a response it should be evident that the outcomes are dependant upon how such events are managed,just like your trade. As such, exact parallels do not exist except as can be accounted for on a random basis.
At the moment what we can see is we are now dealing with a bigger range than we have had for some years hence the volatility whilst everybody guesses at what they can't yet see. We're in a range on dailies and above ,nothing more.Arguably we may be sideways ,but even that is a stretch at this point
What we are also seeing is straight linism. Whilst markets do make V turns (straight lines) most don't and long trends typically take months to years to make a confirmed turn which is far longer than the average attention span can tolerate without jumping to conclusions.