Hoggums
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,176
- Likes
- 878
I stil don't see anny holes.
But time will tell.
I can see a major hole...
PROFIT FACTOR < 0.1 ! :-0
I stil don't see anny holes.
But time will tell.
you comment is interesting,'
I have spent the last 15 year earnining a living from trading.
I will have a good look your Migfx. And believe me if there is a hole I will find it.
Which type of platforn does it run from, does it lock/jam on announcments. Can you scalpP c
Are the bars indicative of the true time frame. etc is a 15 min chart 15min. have you timed this?
How many banks supply the FXdata in or you get thebest fill?
How did you come across thisw platform.
not having a dig, just want to know.
Are there stop hunters?
I can see a major hole...
PROFIT FACTOR < 0.1 ! :-0
Profit FactorWhat do you mean with Profit Factor?
I can see a major hole...
PROFIT FACTOR < 0.1 ! :-0
5 pages now and still no LIVE account data....
Yesterday: 8;22AM: Balance at this moment: 21 354$
(but statement showing open orders worth: "Floating P/L: -1 551.61")
nett = approx $19,900.
Today: Balance at this moment: 21 978$
( statement showing unrealised losses of;"Floating P/L: -5 320.27")
nett = approx $16,600.
although you are showing an incremental increase of $600 over yesterday on closed trades, you are being misleading by failing to show an increase of unrealised losses. the nett amount is a reduction in equity by about $3,300 over yesterday. these intra-trade drawdowns affects the usefulness of the system.
your increase of $10,000 to about $21,000 in closed trades is commendable. but your open (losing) trades means your actual equity is $5000 less than the profits you show.
unless you show the full picture, this is clearly misleading, and you need to explain why you dont show the full picture.
if the market bounces up and the losses reduce, it will be due to luck and not judgement.
I think this thread is a slow-burn, low-impact spam, unless you can answer the questions of the motivations of posting selectively. this affects newbies who might get suckered in.
now, I am all for automated systems, and you can glean the underlying method from them. but this peculiar behaviour is clearly non-standard. any newbie buying this wouldnt know when to over-ride the system rules. (except when they were scared out of their wits at the drawdowns)
EDIT: I think I need to get out more.
So if I understood it good:
Profit factor = Gross profit / Gross loss
Profit factor = 46 458 / 34 479
Then I come to a profit factor of 1.35, How do you come to 0.1 (or did I miss something)?
No.
Profit factor = Average profit per winning trade / Average loss per losing trade
Yesterday: 8;22AM: Balance at this moment: 21 354$
(but statement showing open orders worth: "Floating P/L: -1 551.61")
nett = approx $19,900.
Today: Balance at this moment: 21 978$
( statement showing unrealised losses of;"Floating P/L: -5 320.27")
nett = approx $16,600.
although you are showing an incremental increase of $600 over yesterday on closed trades, you are being misleading by failing to show an increase of unrealised losses. the nett amount is a reduction in equity by about $3,300 over yesterday. these intra-trade drawdowns affects the usefulness of the system.
your increase of $10,000 to about $21,000 in closed trades is commendable. but your open (losing) trades means your actual equity is $5000 less than the profits you show.
unless you show the full picture, this is clearly misleading, and you need to explain why you dont show the full picture.
if the market bounces up and the losses reduce, it will be due to luck and not judgement.
I think this thread is a slow-burn, low-impact spam, unless you can answer the questions of the motivations of posting selectively. this affects newbies who might get suckered in.
Cobblers to all this. I'm up 45,000k on a morning's oil trade... and I missed the entry by half!!!
Are we talking JPY here?