mr.marcus said:...my truce is still on db......your just making me feel like i cant post anything without saying its already be done....if i start a new thread will you post the same again...serious question.no need to go to war over this.this isnt about whos right or wrong...its about allowing others to post also.thanks.apologies if my last post showed frustration....
Olipro said:let's not waste time discussing the mechanics of the topic and discourse of speech... and instead, let's discuss the topic
linesniffer said:If there are known laws, then maybe everything could be known in advance.
Price is the consequence of buying and selling, therefore price is a reaction and delayed.
Any thoughts?
Bez said:Or price can practically standstill ( narrow spread) while large volume prints go off, which is a good hint of mischief especially at tops....
blackcab said:Are the standard supply and demand theories just plain wrong now because:
1. Price is moved more by direct manipulation now than in the past
2. More participants now than in the past conceal their true motives in their trading action
3. More participants now than in the past are stupid, ignorant, inexperienced, etc.
4. Enough participants know enough about classic supply/demand theory and have enough computing power to be able to predict price action and so it is traded out before it has chance to happen, thereby disrupting price action to the extent that you can't apply standard supply and demand theories anymore
5. The population of participants is sufficiently diverse in terms of motivations, tools, methods and inter-instrumentedness now compared with in the past to nullify a simple, single-market supply and demand analysis
6. More trading now than in the past is by computers than humans
7. More trading now than in the past is technical/short term than fundamental/long term
8. A combination of these
9. None of these
10. Anything I ticked would be wrong in order to retain my lottery ticket so I might as well tick here
dbphoenix said:Post what you like, marcus. I was pointing out a resource. And if I hadn't been asked direct questions, I wouldn't be posting at all.
You and Albert are a real pair.
Yes, exactly we are a real pair and I will tell you why we are exactly.dbphoenix said:Post what you like, marcus. I was pointing out a resource. And if I hadn't been asked direct questions, I wouldn't be posting at all.
You and Albert are a real pair.
mr.marcus said:.....nope....price is not a reflection of volume.its good to ask questions....but how about giving your own thoughts and ideas.....and bottom line if you dont develop your own ideas and thoughts how do you know the information being presented to you is correct?your asking huge questions which dont take 2 minute answers...not correct ones anyways.and if your were just plated the correct ones they would mean nothing to you without walking the journey for yourself.anyone who insists the answers are easy to derive...ask to see their trading results ..i can guarantee they wont be that impressive.to arrive at the destination takes a shed load of work and free thought.your questions are very good btw.....each one deserves a thread in its own right.happy hunting.
sandpiper said:WAKE UP and smell the coffee here...
Not for nothing db, but sandpiper is absolutely right. This thread was the first one that has come along in ages that had real potential for learning and you before anyone had asked, came and disrupted it. Nobody is trying to put down your p/v threads, in fact their is a ton of value in them, but let others express themselves even if you disagree with what they are saying. Who knows, you may realize that your more on the same page than previously thought.sandpiper said:DB,
Rather than resorting to attempting to get other players sent off why not let other members have their say, express their opinions, etc. The unfortunate aspect to your posts is they suggest that everything that isn't expressed according to your own limited frame of reference is 'put down' as a 'diversion' or 'off topic'. I'm sure it will come as a shock to you, perhaps to others as well, but the PV thread is not the font of all knowledge.
firewalker99 said:If I decided to buy 100.000 shares tomorrow, of a company that only trades around 200.000 shares daily, well... that would influence price to say the least. Would those laws be able to predict that? So how can everything (or anything) be known in advance?
Yo Mr.m'mr.marcus said:.....so what creates the strongest trends?
mr.marcus said:.....so what creates the strongest trends?