Powerball Prediction Studies

[zsengeller]

Hello friends,
I make predictions by modeling the Powerball lottery in the USA. There may be some remarkable results, which is why I will share them with you under this thread.

A prediction about the March 1, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 30-36

 

[zsengeller]

Hello friends,
I make predictions by modeling the Powerball lottery in the USA. There may be some remarkable results, which is why I will share them with you under this thread.

A prediction about the March 1, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 30-36

The Powerball draw results for Saturday, March 1, 2025 are as follows, you can view the video of the draw on Powerball's website or on various channels on Youtube:

36 02 49 23 44 25

My prediction regarding the 1st ball was successfully fulfilled, and thank God for that, it did not disappoint me. I will share my new prediction in the coming days.

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 5, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 24-36

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 5, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 24-36

The first ball in the March 5 draw was 40 and the prediction failed.

 

[Rufus_Leakey]

The first ball in the March 5 draw was 40 and the prediction failed.

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 15, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 6-18

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 15, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 6-18

I apologize that there were some slips in my last two predictions. I think I mixed something up. Let's examine now;

- In my previous prediction, I said "1st ball will be a number between 24-36 " and the numbers that came out in the draw were as follows: 24 28 40 63 65 20
- My prediction for the March 15 draw was as I shared above and yesterday's draw results are as follows: 12 28 33 36 54 5

I've been a bit sleep deprived for the last two weeks, which I think is why I've been careless. I think I got the data entry backwards. I'll take the model in for maintenance and update it for the next prediction.

 

[Rufus_Leakey]

A prediction about the March 15, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 6-18

- My prediction for the March 15 draw was as I shared above and yesterday's draw results are as follows: 12 28 33 36 54 5

I've been a bit sleep deprived for the last two weeks, which I think is why I've been careless. I think I got the data entry backwards. I'll take the model in for maintenance and update it for the next prediction.

This is all fun, but do you seriously think your model can accurately predict random outcomes?
Or, are you asserting the results are not random?

 

[zsengeller]

View attachment 340680
View attachment 340682


This is all fun, but do you seriously think your model can accurately predict random outcomes?
Or, are you asserting the results are not random?

The results are not random. There was just a little confusion. The terms "Ball" and "Number" seemed to be interchangeable. Even the mistakes made above show that there is a correlation and not a coincidence. Normally, this work is based on very, very complicated calculations. A lot of care is needed. It makes a prediction by dividing 69 numbers into groups of 6, which mostly gives two consecutive groups as output, and sometimes -even when very deep calculations are made- it can give only one group as output, as in my first prediction. Examine the three predictions I gave carefully and see the details there. You will have more fun, if you need fun.

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 22, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 43-54

 

[Rufus_Leakey]

A prediction about the March 22, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 43-54

I'm beginning to have doubts about your system.😛

 

[zsengeller]

A prediction about the March 22, 2025 Powerball draw:
1st ball will be a number between 43-54

The first ball in the March 22 draw was 57 and the prediction failed.

 

[zsengeller]

View attachment 340838
View attachment 340837

I'm beginning to have doubts about your system.😛

It is not possible to achieve 100% success in every draw; I am not a magician either.

 

[Rufus_Leakey]

It is not possible to achieve 100% success in every draw; I am not a magician either.

Here is someone else's analysis of Powerball draws:

How “Random” is The Lottery, Really?

I once had a friend who told me he had a little project going. Every night after work he would sit with a pen, a paper, and a calculator…

medium.com

But, our p-value for this set, despite what an untrained eye would identify as a definite pattern, is only 0.220123.
...
What this difference tells us with confidence is that there is indeed only a 22% chance that every variation we see on this chart is due to nothing but random fluctuations.

That p-value is not statistically significant.

So, even if the numbers drawn do not have a perfect even distribution, the patterns in them are likely not predictive.

 

[zsengeller]

Here is someone else's analysis of Powerball draws:

How “Random” is The Lottery, Really?

I once had a friend who told me he had a little project going. Every night after work he would sit with a pen, a paper, and a calculator…

medium.com

That p-value is not statistically significant.
View attachment 340856
So, even if the numbers drawn do not have a perfect even distribution, the patterns in them are likely not predictive.

I use a very different and fractal methodology. Statistics is based on either the frequency of occurrence of something or its average, which is not very important in terms of success. Here, in the operations performed, I have a lot of personal mistakes. The main reason for the problem is that I am doing a lot of calculations half-programmed and half-manually. My methodology is based on the idea that data progresses in a way that creates a geometry. In other words, there is a pattern behind every data set that we cannot see with the naked eye. There is much stronger evidence for this than the science of statistics.