Glenn
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,040
- Likes
- 118
starspacer said:Precisely, all is known in advance.
Ok I'll leave you happy in your alleged knowledge of the future and what is and is not bs.
Best wishes to you.
Glenn
starspacer said:Precisely, all is known in advance.
starspacer said:Precisely, all is known in advance.
To clarify: I refer to all the 'edge' factors which go towards measuring and accurately appraising market conditions, rather than specific minute to minute price movements. I should have been clearer but had a rather sumptuous feast awaiting (8 ounce wild boar with brioche toast and a glass of De Sanglia 1989 vintage).dc2000 said:care to demonstrate?? next weeks FTSE ? just the daily high and low will be fine
starspacer said:. . .
As for the FTSE, my market is more the commodities & you will note from previous posts that anyone who has followed my path & forecasts would be immensely wealthy by now.
You clearly haven't interpreted my posts correctly. The NatGas was closed out at a substantial profit (I posted the exact timings and trades including when exited). If you read my comments on the Dow and interpret them correctly and in context,I was predicting that the exact opposite would occur. I predicted a surge then a crash. We are still in the mid stages of the surge and I have benefited enormously from that (although my holdings have mostly been in gold & precious metals over the past few years).A Dashing Blade said:Er, one call on Natural Gas (no idea, I'm not in the office atm) and two calls predicting the Dow would crash from what I can see? Clearly that second bottle of De Sanglia 1989 was off.
Precisely, exactly. Everything is known in advance. I have a dinner guest you would all die to meet and that Bully and chums admire greatly but have made a brief excuse just to pop in to see what is going on here.....Tomorrow when all the divinations are made and the number crunch is complete I will be able to give you a clearer idea of what I will do next. But now I have to return for the coffee and mints.starspacer said:Precisely, all is known in advance.
This is the exact transcript of my post #528 (posted on 11th Feb 2006).A Dashing Blade said:Er, one call on Natural Gas (no idea, I'm not in the office atm) and two calls predicting the Dow would crash from what I can see? Clearly that second bottle of De Sanglia 1989 was off.
Subsequent to my post the Dow did go through 11k, then on the 13th June 06, slumped to 10,706. All exactly as predicted in advance by myself.I'd be careful about shorting the Dow at this moment - it just seems to want another tilt at 11k. My feeling is that it will cross 11k again at some point, pull in all the bullz and then break its Jan lows, probably in the May- Nov time.
The liquidity spigot is gushing right now, which makes shorting and holding anything problematic. My strategy is selective intra-day trades and adding to core energy holdings on corrections, particularly NatGas which tends to bottom around Feb/March. Will also look to add to gold once all the goldbullz have disappeared.
starspacer said:You clearly haven't interpreted my posts correctly. The NatGas was closed out at a substantial profit (I posted the exact timings and trades including when exited). If you read my comments on the Dow and interpret them correctly and in context,I was predicting that the exact opposite would occur. I predicted a surge then a crash. We are still in the mid stages of the surge and I have benefited enormously from that (although my holdings have mostly been in gold & precious metals over the past few years).
You conveniently didn't mention that on that same thread, I made a bold prediction about the price of gold, which, of course came to pass.
I will now enjoy a 2nd glass and toast continued success.
starspacer said:I sense the time is nearing when the rolled up newspapers will be smartly thwacked across the black swan.
DC, Glenn, DB, please, no more bs.
starspacer said:There is a flaw in this argument. The flaw is that the mathematical odds you and pt quote inherently assume that the options writer has no edge. The mathematics says that if the writer keeps writing forever, then at some point, and assuming he does not have an edge, he will blow up. Very true, but I believe Soc is saying that he does have the necessary 'edge' to avoid a blowout. And, whilst he continues to be profitable, no-one can truthfully claim that he does not have this 'edge'. The trading zephyr is with him, so to speak.
bluetipex said:A very popular thread, which has perhaps deviated a little from the original theme.
I have only dabbled in options a few years back, so am by no means an expert. There are many here who I'm sure are far more knowledgeable, so what I'm about to say may be completely wrong! I'm sure I'll be corrected very swiftly if that is the case!
It has been said that the Writer has the edge over the Buyer, and I believe this to be true from simply looking at the 3 to 1 ratio of successful end results of writing over buying. However, I, like a few others, submit that this has not been proven by the exercise completed. Simple logic is all that is required to conclude this. In addition, the "edge" has never been adequately defined. It is up to the subjective opinion of the reader to define this for themselves. Therefore, the stated aim of this thread has NOT been accomplished.
In my humble opinion, a simplistic view of a successful trader is one who is skilled in predicting TIMING and DIRECTION. If one can master this then you will be successful.
What Socrates has proven, in my humble opinion, is that he has mastered this very, very, very difficult task. (I have assumed that the trades were actually placed by him, etc. I believe he deserves the benefit of the doubt).
To emphasise my point even more clearly, I'd like you to consider the following scenario:
Suppose another contributer to T2W, let's say his nick is "PYTHAGORUS", decided to prove that Option BUYERS have the edge over Option WRITERS by successfully completing 20 option trades, buying FTSE Call options over the past 3-4 weeks. He posted his trades live, and could be seen on the web etc. These 20 trades are all profitable. How many of you would then agree that PYTHAGORUS has proven his hypothesis? I would not. I would say that PYTHAGORUS is an excellent trader, and has mastered market TIMING and DIRECTION. He would deserve, in my opinion, equal respect and admiration as Socrates.
If PYTHAGORUS and SOCRATES sit opposite each other, each drinking a glass of their favourite tipple, each arguing that their case has been proven, who would win the argument? Surely they would go round and round and round in circles?
The above scenario illustrates why I believe the stated aim of this thread has not been proven. A DIFFERENT exercise would have to be carried out to PROVE this aim, after having DEFINED all the parameters involved, especially "EDGE".
Would one of you option experts please correct me if my grasp of options has been exposed for the inadequacy that is highly likely? Please show me the flaw in my logic.
(I also wonder how quickly someone will create the nick "PYTHAGORUS" and start posting live trades!!!!)
I have just come in as my dinner guests have just left.counter_violent said:CYOF
You have stated time after time that you know nothing.......
I absolutely agree....
actually I will go further.....
less than nothing
are you happy now ?
. We have been discussing this very topic in detail over dinner and the general consensus is that you are wrong. A good whack always does the trick.Splitlink said:Yes, but I am afraid that a folded newspaper will not do the job.
Split
bluetipex said:A very popular thread, which has perhaps deviated a little from the original theme.
I have only dabbled in options a few years back, so am by no means an expert. There are many here who I'm sure are far more knowledgeable, so what I'm about to say may be completely wrong! I'm sure I'll be corrected very swiftly if that is the case!
It has been said that the Writer has the edge over the Buyer, and I believe this to be true from simply looking at the 3 to 1 ratio of successful end results of writing over buying. However, I, like a few others, submit that this has not been proven by the exercise completed. Simple logic is all that is required to conclude this. In addition, the "edge" has never been adequately defined. It is up to the subjective opinion of the reader to define this for themselves. Therefore, the stated aim of this thread has NOT been accomplished.
In my humble opinion, a simplistic view of a successful trader is one who is skilled in predicting TIMING and DIRECTION. If one can master this then you will be successful.
What Socrates has proven, in my humble opinion, is that he has mastered this very, very, very difficult task. (I have assumed that the trades were actually placed by him, etc. I believe he deserves the benefit of the doubt).
To emphasise my point even more clearly, I'd like you to consider the following scenario:
Suppose another contributer to T2W, let's say his nick is "PYTHAGORUS", decided to prove that Option BUYERS have the edge over Option WRITERS by successfully completing 20 option trades, buying FTSE Call options over the past 3-4 weeks. He posted his trades live, and could be seen on the web etc. These 20 trades are all profitable. How many of you would then agree that PYTHAGORUS has proven his hypothesis? I would not. I would say that PYTHAGORUS is an excellent trader, and has mastered market TIMING and DIRECTION. He would deserve, in my opinion, equal respect and admiration as Socrates.
If PYTHAGORUS and SOCRATES sit opposite each other, each drinking a glass of their favourite tipple, each arguing that their case has been proven, who would win the argument? Surely they would go round and round and round in circles?
The above scenario illustrates why I believe the stated aim of this thread has not been proven. A DIFFERENT exercise would have to be carried out to PROVE this aim, after having DEFINED all the parameters involved, especially "EDGE".
Would one of you option experts please correct me if my grasp of options has been exposed for the inadequacy that is highly likely? Please show me the flaw in my logic.
(I also wonder how quickly someone will create the nick "PYTHAGORUS" and start posting live trades!!!!)
Think of a balanced six sided dice, numbered 1 thru 6. What are the odds of throwing a number 3 ? or throwing a number 5 ? 6/1 I here you say, or 16.7% I here you say too.starspacer said:
There is a flaw in this argument. The flaw is that the mathematical odds you and pt quote inherently assume that the options writer has no edge. The mathematics says that if the writer keeps writing forever, then at some point, and assuming he does not have an edge, he will blow up. Very true, but I believe Soc is saying that he does have the necessary 'edge' to avoid a blowout. And, whilst he continues to be profitable, no-one can truthfully claim that he does not have this 'edge'. The trading zephyr is with him, so to speak.
starspacer said:A little allegory might help to illuminate the ideas submitted in this thread, as clearly, many don’t (or are unable to) grasp true Socratic thinking.
There is a world called Tulipsia. .......
starspacer said:A little allegory might help to illuminate the ideas submitted in this thread, as clearly, many don’t (or are unable to) grasp true Socratic thinking.
There is a world called Tulipsia. This world is quite small and consists of one large country called Herdia and one small island called Socratai.
The 2 places are very different. Over 95% of the world live in Herdia. It is a very unpleasant place. Full of people viciously competing amongst themselves to out do each other, but in a way that appears that they are actually helping one another. It is rather like Dante’s hell. A place where people have cut down all the trees to build identikit homes. Mass factory produced food is injected with hormones to feed the ever expanding population. A dense smog hangs permanently over the country, which effects the ability of the people to clearly think. Rather like a smog on the brain. The Thought Police, who control Herdia add mind-numbing chemicals to this smog so that they can keep the population suitably in check.
For the people in Herdia, although life is grim, they daren’t make the long and gruelling journey to Socratai. They are told by their Thought Police that the Socrataiins are deranged thinkers and cannibals who enjoy nothing better than dining on the sweet delicacy of Herdian flesh. That said, there is quite a thriving trade between the 2 countries. Herdia exports smog filters, which are needed by Socrataiins to keep their island from becoming polluted from the dense clouds that drift across from Herdia. In exchange, Socrataiins write options, which are always in great demand.
Unfortunately, Herdia runs a substantial trade deficit with Socratai. The Socrataiins, being of generous nature regularly write off this debt.
The Socrataiins are a very small group of people who have undertaken the extraordinarily difficult journey from Herdia. Once they found this paradise island, they determined that it must remain so & not become destroyed by greed, avarice and poor thinking. They built magnificent cultural buildings, the like of which had never been seen before. These buildings blended perfectly with the scenery and were of extraordinary aesthetic beauty.
Although the Socrataiins are less than 5% of the world population, they earn 95% of the wealth. Now the Socrataiins have the genius necessary to take 100%, but they realize that this would create enormous jealousy and that they would be eventually invaded by the Herdians. They gather together regularly for collective meetings of thought and permit Herdia to continue to believe that Socratai is an island of deluded lunatics and narcissists, a truly unpleasant place. They also, now & again write an option which loses a modest amount so that the Herdians can continue to feed themselves.
Socrataiins enjoy an Elysian life, but one they are determined to keep. Even now, they are building a truly astounding defence shield, which one day, will be needed to boomerang away the enormous influx of Herdians, who are, even now, beginning to gather at the gates.