I spoke to my manager this morning and he had me do an exercise where before every trade I write down my reason for getting in the trade, where my stop is, where my target is etc...
As much as this helpe, I still found myself jumping into trades; so I shall carry this on next week and with practise and routine I would hope to reduce the jumping in.
Rules of engagement. (trial and error reasoning & practices (in order to develop a method) aside) I would of thought this basic step should be in place before a trader even considers "engaging" .
So if it is, then is it knowledge of suitable rules of engagement that are lacking or need improving?
Or the rules being worked with are known but we do not trust them?
Or the rules are known we do trust them, but we still find ourselves being drawn into battle and we are beaten. ?
*The latter I think is due to exploitation of the typical human condition ,who is drawn mainly to hunt on sight, a bit like the instinct of a cat seeing a bird land and flap close by, the cat will then look to attack. A trader might be enticed to attack a price popping out of a tight range with the feelings of "this is the breakout" only to be shafted as the price then whips the other side!
Development of observation will help. (6-12 months ?) Of course all this desire needs to come from within the individual. No one can give that to a person. mm maybe the idea of the desire can be sold, hence clever marketeers....
Once knowledge is cool, environment is cool (suitable to allow observation to develop and function without distracting the observer) then it might just be down to seeing how the human typically is conditioned to act, being aware of that and training yourself to act when the market acts and not when the market wants you to act.
*Now if what governs the market to act is a simple as "weight of clients money" building at level x therefore we will steal this, then just replace that into the possible reason why a market actually acts the way it does as opposed to a collective functioning entity that does not solely rely on exploitation of clients money as opposed to clients behaviour. Maybe thats a chicken and egg thing. I don't dwell on it but its a valid Q i think.
Maybe thats the reason. Over trading = under knowledged. Has to be?