Loooong Term (or how to make money in a market going nowhere)

OK - this will get a little dull for a few posts but there's a few more scenarios we need to throw at AIM.

A slightly shorter period as I want to test an 'n' shape price curve - again with price ending up where it started.

attachment.php


Again - a market going nowhere.

Buy and Hold:
attachment.php


Initial Investment : $100,000
End Num Shares : 3703
End Value : $96,389.09

AIM
attachment.php


Initial Investment : $100,000
End Num Shares :3,446
End Value Shares : $89,699.38
End Value Cash : $27,817.80
End Portfolio Value : $117,517.18

The point here is to see if AIM is robust. Thus far AIM has...

- reduced the return on an market that goes straight up
- increased the return on different types of market that end up where they started.

Note that I don't intend to buy anything that ends up where it started - it's just a test.

Also note that AIM is tunable. The initial % in cash is 50% in the original version. Portfolio control adjustment is 50% of any purchases. There are some 'improvements' on AIM that came later & those MAY be tested too.

For instance, you you adjust the safe pct from 10 to 50%, the above AIM results now look like this :

attachment.php


Initial Investment : $100,000
End Num Shares :2,292
End Value Shares : $59,660.76
End Value Cash : $82,437.71
End Portfolio Value : $142,098.47

So - for now, I'm not going to dick around with the parameters for AIM. It can be done, it will affect results but it is a variable that needs to be tested later IMO...

Also - as expectations can affect results, I'd better tell you where I think this is heading:

1 - AIM may actually conflict with Asset Allocation strategy that also dictates when you buy/sell (on re-balancing)
2 - If spreading the risk across 5 or 6 non correlated asset classes, you probably don't need to put away 50% of the entire portfolio in the cash account at the outset. As the asset classes are not correlated, some markets should be adding to the cash account whilst another is drawing on it.
3 - obviously there are times, as we saw earlier this year, where many, if not all asset classes can be correlated.
 

Attachments

  • nShapeCurve.jpg
    nShapeCurve.jpg
    72.8 KB · Views: 815
  • CPTBuy&Hold.jpg
    CPTBuy&Hold.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 813
  • CPT-AIM.jpg
    CPT-AIM.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 1,084
  • CPT-AIM.xls
    51.5 KB · Views: 220
  • CPT-Buy&Hold.xls
    53.5 KB · Views: 231
  • CPT-AIM-SafeAdjusted.jpg
    CPT-AIM-SafeAdjusted.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 1,006
  • CPT-AIMSafeAdjusted.xls
    51.5 KB · Views: 290
Last edited:
OK - for the one person still reading this... :LOL:

Now for a 'u' shaped market. Thank heavens for the .com bubble....

attachment.php


AMZN Buy & Hold
attachment.php

Initial Investment : $100,000
End Num Shares : 1147
End Value : $103,264.41 (plus $2.52 in cash:clover: 2 lottery tickets ???)

AMZN AIM
attachment.php


Initial Investment : $100,000
End Num Shares :805
End Value Shares : $72,474.15
End Value Cash : $51,218.93
End Portfolio Value : $123,693.08

OK - no surprises - AIM still doing what it says on the tin.
 

Attachments

  • uShapeCurve.jpg
    uShapeCurve.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 776
  • AMZN-Buy&Hold.jpg
    AMZN-Buy&Hold.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 1,119
  • AMZN-AIM.jpg
    AMZN-AIM.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 835
  • AMZN-AIM.xls
    50.5 KB · Views: 268
  • AMZN-Buy&Hold.xls
    53.5 KB · Views: 192
Gold over the past 30 years has underperformed CPI.
Gold over the past 31 years has outperformed CPI.

It's not what you buy but when you buy. This is what AIM attempts to address...
 
OK - for the one person still reading this...

Well, this one person certainly appreciates your posts. Please keep up the excellent work. Head and shoulders above most of the junk on T2W.

I intend to do some testing myself when I have time.
 
Top