20 minutes is not enough to pour scorn on that question.
i'll answer that in 2 parts
major institutions is a bit generic, each trade depends on a trader and most of the analyst work you read that give you S&R levels are for their prime clients based on major indicators. yes, i am aware of levels that are talked bout but i use TA just to look at entry/exit levels rather than bas e astrategy on them. if i feel the time is right to do a trade then no point arseing about for 3/4 ticks here or there. just pull the trigger. saying that i do know huge technical traders at "major institutions" that trade totally on TA but that's not for me. as i say a little generic to ask across the board given that each traders remit/preferences are different.
I assumed that the banks had an organisational target/goal that would nee dto be reached for cash flow purposes and that funds would just tell clients whatever to get their money and just do what they were doing. That's why I asked that generically but I suppose thats me jumping to conclusions again.
huge. pretty much all hedging of derivs is done in futures or cash-i can give you so many examples of 100 tick moves in underlying because of some exotic structured position. gamma mentioned somewhere yesterday how on expiry underlying often drifts towards a large option strike (for example) due to market makers playing with gamma/tuning detla.
I got laughed at for saying that. I just said it makes sense to that the price is going to go there if big guns have an interest in it getting there.