The definition we use for ROI (Return on Investment) is [GAIN (minus) COST] expressed as a percentage.
I personally like 2% of capital at risk implying I need $5K per contract traded which is exactly what i am currently doing.
Given that you prefer 2% risk and $5k per contract, and factoring in that even this is in the upper band of the generally accepted risk advice, may I suggest that you quote your paper performance figures based on this 'COST' base? The 300% figure which you threw up is really quite meaningless. I have seen you questioned on what this figure is before now, people don't relate to it, and as the above posts highlight quite clearly, it makes you look very much like a marketeer. And even TI would appear confused by it - on your very own website there is this statement:
'In January alone, the live signals called in the room produced over 200% Return on Investment. This represents a 20% return on trading accounts which by industry standards is simply stunning!'
How does 200% drop down to 20%? Or rather, why are you even using a ROI figure 10x bigger than the generally accepted ROI figure that 'ordinary' people (ie. your intended market) would relate best to? It really is quite silly.
For our performance reporting, we can definitely quote dollar per contract - sure - but it means that we have to average the results achieved across the entire trading room and this is a huge logistical task.
I don't see why. To get the ROI you are using ticks gained or lossed, so these could easily be converted to dollars. Oh and why you're at it, it shouldn't be difficult to take out the amount for the brokerage. This can make a significant difference to the P&L when scalping.
We do not have control over the markets nor how quickly they move so on occasions, some traders may not get filled. On the larger markets, we now focus on, I only hear very few if any reports in the room of people missing an entry. All of our advanced traders use market orders. This ensures that they get into the market, then they can manage their stops and targets as they have been taught.
When I was at a TI sign up seminar, your former boss told me that he would get into 98% of trades. I strongly hold the view that this was a cold hard lie, purposefully aimed at having us believe the TI system was not only profitable on paper but also executable. It did of course take some experience to realise that it was not as executable as suggested.
Not getting fills has been a common complaint in the past, both on the pre market S&P, and also on the fast moving cash market. The last time I was given access to the TI rooms, which was about 2yrs after I joined, I discovered that traders en masse were still missing entries on many of the good trades. This was a good 21 months after me, as a newbie, realised that room trading using limit orders was not profitable. Yet here were incoming TI members being guided into trades using the same very well known costly entry technique that would lower the executed success rate of the trading system from the paper 7/10 to around the 5/10 at best. If I recall correctly, you even came into the room that night & complaints were made, and you acknowledged that 'limit orders don't work'. It is good to see that you have changed the entry strategy (tho I can forsee some slippage issues if you've got a big room full of multiple contract traders), but it left me disgusted that other new traders had to learn the costly way that trading the TI methodology would not work, particularly as they had paid a substantial sum to be shown how to trade. In my time at TI I learnt as much about how not to trade as I did learn about trading.
When it comes to showing returns, I have multiple traders who are openly happy to volunteer their live trading statements as proof that they are trading well.
Where could one get hold of these?
I think that actual quoted text grabs out of the live trading room are a great measure of what can be achieved.
Disagree. I was in one of your rooms back in 2008 when Yoav called a lucky trade which exceeded his and everyone else's expectations and we took 120 ticks off the S&P, for a risk of 6 ticks. Yoav asked traders in the room to comment on it and they were like 'going out to buy a ferrari', 'Took 30 pts fantastic' etc. This was the most profitable trade ever called in the rooms during my time, but it was the comments taken after this trade that were put on your website as if it was a regular occurrence. Due to the history of TI being highly selective in which comments they publish, I do not believe they give any useful indication of the consistency of their trader's profitibility, and after the above experience I completely ignore them.
I will work toward having the TI Dedicated Live Trading Statement (which we currently have for FOREX Trading already) and we will be able to put the whole issue to bed.
That would be good. Where is the FOREX trading one to be found?
Anyway, welcome to T2W and it is good to see you coming on here using your real name. I do hope the new methods are as profitable as you make out. I have asked the above questions mostly so that any newcomers are better positioned to get some hard evidence regarding the profitability of the new TI methods. You lost me as a client for good a long time ago. FYI when I opened a FOREX account I deliberately excluded TI as the referring authority, because you were not up front about receiving a kickback, and also you stated on your website that there would be designated support personnel and a unique support phone number at the broker just for TI clients. When I had a look at the broker's website, the very same number was supplied to all of the broker's clients. With such indisputable sales deception (even tho minor & inconsequential) still lingering under your watch, why would I allow any part of my brokerage to go to TI?