My reason is as follows. I spend enoough hours in the day managing funds and would like to find people who can make great returns that i can invest in so they can work for me like I work for my investors. I am sure there are people out there who are under capitalised and at an early stage who would jump at the chance for capital. there is no reason, if the method its scaleable that it cannot grow into something substantial. I am always looking for diversification and hence my offer. Only one reply so far.
TWI, I understand your side of the business. (And for those concerned about passing proprietary information on to a 3rd party, TWI is extremely unlikely to be interested in exploiting anybody's system, it simply is not in his interest to do so for all sorts of reasons). As a fund manager (you may well also trade your own account, but that’s a separate issue), your job is to attract investors, trading managers and traders and various other admin staff to provide an income to your investors, and an income for your company (investment management and profit-based fees). You are presumably regulated, of solid standing, impeccable accounts and independently performance rated on a regular basis. Anyone wishing to put mega-bucks into a reasonably safe and somewhat better than deposit account returns would consider TWI rather than that bloody maverick, TheBramble any day – regardless of their relative return on capital. And quite understandably.
Fund management is quite a different kettle of fish to trading. While I trade because I enjoy it and it makes me income, I have no specific interest in the corporate side of fund management, building a behemoth of immense financial corporate standing and getting involved in all the non-trading activities required of such a venture. I’m sure you’re excellent at it, as I am at trading. No value judgement – neither is better/worse than the other – just different businesses with a very general connection.
But here’s my point, you say ‘so they can work for you like you do for your investors’. Why would they want to? Nobody with even a 10% per month system is going to need external support. Even if they start with zero funds, they’re going to be able to convince someone, relatives, friends whatever to put up the readies at a far lower rate of interest than 50% - forever. And to grow their meagre startup capital at a rate quite quickly to a level that is sustainable for income and growth.
As for scalable, there’s the rub, similar to the Peter Principle. While I’m comfortable growing my capital at its current rate and (as posted yesterday) draw sufficient income form it to live very well while growing it and see no imminent danger of managing an amount that means I’m finding it tough to get filled, it does grow at a manageable and organic rate. If I were to suddenly substantially increase the capital base, I’m not sure psychological issues on the performance of my trading could be ignored. And to take something that works ‘to capacity’ implies hitting the ceiling of the method, and where do you, or more importantly, your trader go from there?
I’m sure there are some that thirst for the attractions of bigger money involvement in funds rather than the relatively solitary business of independent trading and would prosper in the move to that environment, but they are in danger of losing their passion and you in killing the golden goose. I’m sure this happens every day and whatever is written on here will make little difference. But if your bid was serious, and I wish you and any applicants good luck, I’d be interested to see how it all pans out.