So here's my issue with this logic then (and I appreciate the fact that I am opening myself up to a proper sh1tstorm here)...
If I believe my fundamental analysis is somehow flawed, I have no confidence in my analytical capabilities. If I have no confidence in my analytical capabilities, why do I then have confidence in my technical/short-term setups? Aren't these products of my own analysis also?
Before you mention information asymmetry, it's not that, as both types of analysis are based on publicly available data.
Yes, but they're based on different data which is also analysed in a different way. FA and TA are really quite different in this respect. If your FA is flawed, then that's all that needs to be brushed up - it may say little about your analytical capabilties for TA.
For example, I think my FA is better than my TA because I'm not highly meticulous and patient. That's partly why I program strategies more than I do the type of detailed TA done by bbmac