i think zeds method needs 67% min hit rate over time to be in the money, i think he's mentioned before through research that he's factored for 80% with his plan. Now I know that by being around some times that zeds method kicks in, that reward and risk can be improved, but it requires discretion (subjective). Ive seen other posts on this forum where big stops are used for a r/r of acceptable ? levels 1; 2 or 3 ratios yet the profit is taken early so actual trading risk whilst the trade is open is huge,again discretion when in a trade being used as market action unfolds. Right or wrong ? not an issue as always its back to individuals.
ZD however simply chooses to state his known risk objectives and stick to his plan, this over time may well be enough against deeper level pure discretionary traders cutting trends short from stated profit objectives because of whatever their reasons? Consider that to breakeven in this business is something that many would be happy to aspire to and build upon, any wiff of consistent profit from ZD and his methods is beyond average for average participants.
I do not trade as zed does but am aware of his setups likely entry points around that time of the market if im still working on charts etc. I would suggest that it could be improved if you use discretion on the entry, sometimes ive notice like the call at long 1.2418 the other day it was not good value at that price and the actual price action i'd prefer waiting for a pull back for a long entry it traded towards 12405 and later when 40 pips upwards but this is beyond zeds trade window. His stop would of held on this occassion and targets met. Yet he closed because of his time window rule 3 hours. I see his thinking with these setups and feel that elements can be improved especially if he is watching the market. And perhaps extends his session another 3 Hours 🙂
So pullbacks for value to previous sessions relative s/r'S/extremes might be able to warrant a stop of 12/15 reward 30 + but I wouldnt chase the entry,s .
each to his own as always.