dc2000
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,766
- Likes
- 129
I will be long at 537Anyone for another late day reversal ? - Long at 9589, stop at 9549
I will be long at 537Anyone for another late day reversal ? - Long at 9589, stop at 9549
dc2000 said:I will be long at 537
jacinto said:well, what a pity. i have had to stay flat all day for personal reasons. everytime there is an entry, a wife interrupts with "sweetheart, can you do X?, Sweetheart, can you take the car for service?
Lesson, send your wife to work. dont let them bu99er your day.
City Bound said:A wife? How many have you got jacinto? Good man. :cheesy:
errr, you are right. send them both to work
dc2000 said:I will be long at 537
jacinto said:not that clever really, smaller loss probably, but a loss. price action simply not helping.
We havent even thought of the ECB scenarios yet, and EURGBP seems to be seting up for a long = cable short? . till tomorrow too.
j
thanks.. u r a gentleman in deed! I see alot of break out strategy for cable. probably oscillators are not much useful for it.a_gnome said:Hi there,
Since no one else has answered your question I thought that I would make a few comments. It is possible to trade successfully in all sorts of ways and traders end up finding something that suits them. However I would personally say that it is much easier to trade with the trend then against it. Therefore I would leave divergent oscillator trades alone for the time being - the market has a nasty habit of continuing in a trend despite the fact that all the oscillators are at extremes and signaling a reversal.
Hope this helps.
cheersGood Call !
dc2000 said:You only got two you poor thing what if you break one I'd get a couple more just incase Im sure it would be ok "many hands make light work" an all that
How very thoughtfulit actually crossed my mind at the time, but then thought that 8 would be too much. the risk of one being unemployed was too large
Phil Mibbutz said:Can anyone say why cable fell, or is trying to analyse currency movements a waste of time?
c6ackp said:It was just a technical move - the most powerful setup in the book which coincided with another lesser strategy. The resulting movement hit some "clean air" and, hey presto, 100 pips. The same strategy triggered on the NQ (Nasdaq) this afternoon but the result wasn't quite so spectacular! I call this strategy a "Federer forehand" because it's awesome!!!
c6ackp said:It was just a technical move - the most powerful setup in the book which coincided with another lesser strategy. The resulting movement hit some "clean air" and, hey presto, 100 pips. The same strategy triggered on the NQ (Nasdaq) this afternoon but the result wasn't quite so spectacular! I call this strategy a "Federer forehand" because it's awesome!!!