Jack o'Clubs
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,554
- Likes
- 342
Yes Jack, but you are dealing directly into those markets, that's the point I'm trying to make. By doing so, anything that is deemed taxable in the markets by the govt is not so when using an SB firm because you are not buying and selling directly within these taxable markets. Your point that "index futures...also imply no physical ownership of the asset" is correct, but the govt views it as a taxable asset if you deal directly in this market, but doesn't if you SB, so that's enough for me.
If you spreadbet, you remove yourself from actually owning this taxable asset as you are using the shadow market as I explained.
Can you explain your point r.e. income tax? What income tax? There is none if spread betting, nor is there CGT!!
No, I agree with all of that, I was nit-picking on your point of it being based on asset-ownership. The bigger-picture point of course is that spread-betting is taxed - the government do very well taxing the betting companies that profit out of our poor trading, as well as collecting the betting-levy tax on each bet placed (remember the old days when the punter was liable for betting tax on winnings, before the cost was moved onto the bookies?). One way or another you pay for that through your spread, etc. That's why the government isn't too worried about taxing (mostly losing) punters, because it can tax (mostly winning) bookies instead!
The point on income tax was that a trader doesn't pay CGT anyway (assuming trading a taxable asset) - trading is a business and therefore gains are taxed as income either personally as a sole-trader or as a business.