timsk
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,716
- Likes
- 3,418
Hi Mr. Crabs,I'm glad everyone gets a kick out of my rejection of traditional trading knowledge and terminology.
Rejecting traditional trading knowledge is fine, if you're able to express clearly what's wrong with it and offer something in its place that you think is better. In part, that's what T2W is for, so no issues on that front. However, rejecting traditional trading terminology isn't very helpful, unless you provide good reasons for doing so and explain what words you propose to use instead - with comprehensive definitions. To introduce existing words that have a completely different meaning to the one you attribute to them just muddies the waters. IMO, the criticisms made of you on this front are completely justified, if expressed a tad harshly.
I suggest you stick to traditional terminology and then members will be more inclined to focus on your trading, rather than on your writing style.
Tim.