edge init

:) I guess supreme confidence might be an edge - mind you Leeson had it :devilish:

No, Leeson had the classic beginner's plague of wishing things would come back. It wasn't a sign of confidence, but rather a sign of incomplete tuition. He was unaware of the risk he was in.
 
ok. I do believe I am trading with an edge but I think where I currently am is I am still building confidence in the edge, I am trying to build consistency.

Where do you get an edge? I guess you either use someone else's or modify their edge to suit you. Or design your own. I believe it is important to always refine your edge and monitor it and if possible have multiple edges, if one breaks down you have a couple left.

Trendie already mentioned Street Smarts and the holy grail 'set up'. It's just a simple thing with ADX defining trend, moving average to define distance of pullback and a trigger candle. I have no idea if it is an edge. I would make the point that most people will never know as they dont have the patience and discipline to live test it on 10,20,50,100,500 trades.

I do believe it is possible to trade profitably without an edge just from the gut however the traders experience and discipline are probably in themselves forming the edge.

For me the perfect edge would be something that I can trade maybe 10 times in a 4 to 5 hour trading session with a high strike rate on a rough 1:1 basis. I dont currently have this edge! If I did I would probably be busy behind the screens spanking the hell out of it. lol.

I agree that you can trade profitably from what you might think of as gut feeling, but that is your edge, surely, where you're trading without consciously using all you've learnt from watching charts for hundreds or thousands of hours.

Most people won't have the discipline or funds to test their 'edge' with 500 trades, but they can backtest it pretty easily, and the results might mean just as much, or little. How do you know your strategy won't fall apart immediately after those 500 live trades?
 
What state the market is in is all important for understanding what it will likely to do next.

Here's and exercise for you then BuggererJoe.

Pick a market and then tell me which factors had the most influence in moving price from T to T1 over a given period X and then explain how the chart influenced your answer.
 
Here's and exercise for you then BuggererJoe.

Pick a market and then tell me which factors had the most influence in moving price from T to T1 over a given period X and then explain how the chart influenced your answer.

If the chart point to a trend, then the trend continues until it stops. Entering according to the trend will likely to have a lower average loss should the trend not prevail. The residual trend momentum will more than likely to give you an escape opening, even if briefly. Reducing loss is the key to success, making a win is only secondary. It's all about being in the game, you see ? Losses would curtail that - you would not be around when the 21 wins in a row strikes on the casino table.
 
Last edited:
Not when you look at it, no.

If you'd read my post in it's entirety you'd see that is not what I said... Anyway, why not add some value to the thread instead of the old cynical one liner that's been done to death?

Tell me then, what "edge" can be derived from looking at a chart? I posited that when looking at trading outright on a single instrument in isolation, given access to no information other than price, any "edge" can only arise from statistical or mathematical analysis. If you consider anything else in formulating your trading ideas, then I believe that you are trading your information and not the instrument itself. Challenge me, engage me - we all know Scose has an open mind and loves to learn. Don't just troll teh Scose :cheesy:
 
If the chart point to a trend, then the trend continues until it stops.

And what about the intra-trend volatility? How are you addressing that?

Entering according to the trend will likely to have a lower average loss should the trend not prevail.

You do realise you just spat back a rather crude probability analysis which concurs with the very point I made earlier... the one you're trying to argue against...

The residual trend momentum will more than likely to give you an escape opening, even if briefly.

Reducing loss is the key to success, making a win is only secondary. It's all about being in the game, you see ? Losses would curtail that - you would not be around when the 21 wins in a row strikes on the casino table.

That last paragraphdoes't really warrant a response.
 
If you'd read my post in it's entirety you'd see that is not what I said... Anyway, why not add some value to the thread instead of the old cynical one liner that's been done to death?

Tell me then, what "edge" can be derived from looking at a chart? I posited that when looking at trading outright on a single instrument in isolation, given access to no information other than price, any "edge" can only arise from statistical or mathematical analysis. If you consider anything else in formulating your trading ideas, then I believe that you are trading your information and not the instrument itself. Challenge me, engage me - we all know Scose has an open mind and loves to learn. Don't just troll teh Scose :cheesy:


I thought you'd appreciate a good trolling Scose. Ok then, I'll give my opinion for what little it's worth. In order to find an edge that is going to last you first need to understand the tendencies of price movement of a particular instrument (or group of). Obvious and agreed? I don't care whether you're capitalising on statistical properties, fundamentals, technicals, the DOM, the trait that the instument has doesn't matter, but in each case you need a good understanding of the instrument you're dealing with.

So how do you get this understanding? You could do some stats on raw data, which I like, but you really want a hypothesis to test, and where do we get that from? You'd also have to be aware of the many problems with statistical methods for analysing something like a trading instrument. It's very easy to assume various tools in stats might work when they don't really apply. You could design a neural net, and let that try to do the work for you, but again there are many problems with neural nets, and they are still not going to be as good as your brain at doing the job.

So now we're left with studying the instrument with your brain for a long enough period that something emerges...a possible edge. Your brain is going to be the tool. But it's hard to gain an understanding by simply looking at numbers changing incredibly fast. Some might be able to, but I don't think most can, surely not me. You can help your brain by giving some structure, like a chart. A way to understand what is important. From there it can learn. In this there is also a danger. If you start putting too many things on the chart, 17 indicators, market profile overlays etc. then you also start framing your learning experience, your brain will now be finding a solution that works for the indicators, rather than what's most important. So while learning you really want as little, other than price, on the chart as possible. Not because everything else is useless, just because you are placing less constraints on your learning.

Why only price? Well what is the single mos timportant thing that anyone both in a position already or waiting to trade cares about (I think daytrading mentality always underestimates how many people are already in, and what will keep them in or not)? If I got long the Dow and am in profit and still holding, and there is a negative news report but price surges up. Do I care? Do I exit because the news is bad? Do I care about what's going on in the price ladder or that we're 3 standard deviations above the moving average? Now in contrast if price moves below my entry,a nd is moving rapidly, do I care? Now that's just basics. Next you'd be trying a trading strategy from what emerges from your mind. That in itself will give even more education,a nd will frame your learning in a slightly different way and so on.

In my view the only edge that is going to last, is the one that's placed directly in your head, that is continually evolving. In order to develop it, a chart is magnificent. If you dismiss it, I think you're mistaken. And the post I made, saying that when you look at it then no. Well that's correct based on what you said. When you do look at it, you see nothing. You don't see what I see.

As for the topic, the gut feeling interests me a lot. I am many times in a position, and price moves a little against me, not much. And I have no idea what it is, nor can I systemise it, but I just know that price will hit my stop. And that feeling is right every time. But I can't trade on gut, because I can't control or understand it.
 
Well, let's take this in stages. First the "price action" trade itself:

As far as this is concerned, if I have an edge here it's one that blows hot and cold albeit that, statistically at least, it has proven over thirty years or so to have a better probability than a random call. It can in no way be relied upon, though, and the reason it is variable is because it's pretty mechanical in nature and the market is not (imo). By accident or design it must suit the way my market tends to move for a lot of the time though.

Secondly, money management. If I have an edge here it's one of discipline. I control my risk - it's the only thing I can be reasonably certain of controlling - by a combination of stop and position size and I take profit to a reasonably attainable target that always ensures that my wins exceed my losses by an acceptable (to me) factor. I don't care if I miss more because my overall "money strategy" relies on a consistently achieved R:R factor.

Thirdly, trade management. If I have an edge here - which I doubt - it can only come from long experience of my market which leads me to sometimes run before my stoploss is reached or before my target is hit. I like to think I add a little here, but it's probably just a rosy glow that wouldn't bear much scrutiny.
 
This is the type of thing I'd call an edge. Anything else and you'd better get your probability calculator out cos ain't no edge in looking at chart, whatever you decide to b4stardise it with.
I have to agree, a physical edge would have be something like CD's example.. Info that everyone has access too, like a chart. I cant really see how anyone can claim to have an edge in that way. :confused:
 
Last edited:
I have to agree, a physical edge would have be something like CD's example.. Info that everyone has access too, like a chart. I cant really see how anyone can claim to have an edge in that way. :confused:

The problem is that many participants (as can be seen on this thread alone) appear to think that trading involves looking at a chart. You want to read a chart, just like in music, when we play an instrument we dont "look" at the music we read it.

Only when we have learnt to read and understand can we begin to develop a true "lasting" edge.

This edge is discretionary. It involves "you" the individual, hence no-ones results will be the same. As we are all at differing levels in terms of our self development.

Lack of reading and understanding results in lack of development, which results in a lack of trading edge.

It has to be this way for the individual retail trader as we are not privy to the information flows of the institutional players. This does not mean that we can not spot the games they are playing. It just means we have to know what we are looking for (rather than looking at).

Failing that, we can all just be truly mechanical and see how far that gets us!:clap::clap::clap:
 
Last edited:
I use 1 minute TF. I don't care for intra-trend volatility.

A time-frame is a totally arbitrary construction. Everyone's looking at the same thing. Concerns and issues regarding volatility are equally applicable to a 1 minute time-frame as they are to a monthly time-frame.

Perhaps best not to post about something you clearly don't have a clue about.
 
A time-frame is a totally arbitrary construction. Everyone's looking at the same thing. Concerns and issues regarding volatility are equally applicable to a 1 minute time-frame as they are to a monthly time-frame.

Perhaps best not to post about something you clearly don't have a clue about.

It is not arbitrary construction. It is a very specific 1 minute construction. The trend in other TF's is irrelevant when I trade 1m TF. Maybe you just don't understand the 1m TF as much as I do. In any case, the TF is irrelevant once a trade achieves lift off - when there is no possibility of losing.
 
Last edited:
@ Shakone - That's all well and good but all you're telling me is that your edge lies in your own understanding of the instrument which is imho tantamount to some form of microeconomic analysis of supply/demand factors of that particular instrument. From what you're saying, the edge doesn't come from the chart, in fact it seems to me that you hold past prices inc deviations etc with very little regard and concentrate in the now. How then, is a chart providing an edge?

@wallstreet warrior - Aside from past fluxuations in supply/demand factors, please tell me what you can "read" from a chart? Personally, I believe that market prices are a representation of a dynamic set of incalculable global variables so if institutional traders place their edge in having access to order flow information and they then act on it and thereby negating said edge through the non arbitrage principles then what can be gathered from price alone?

How can any of you be sure that your results are not a just a function of a set of random outcomes with your risk management being the only thing keeping the chart based strategy from ruin?

On a related note teh scose surmises that thinks that each of teh prices in teh market can be expressed as

y= a + bx +b2x + b3x +b4x.... where you're weighted more against certain variables depending on teh instrument

And for the record, Scose only likes to troll shizer threads.
 
Yes, but not one, static, chart.

Yes, but that is YOUR interpretation of it.

Thats the difference.

A script (Music) is static is it not? But when we play it becomes alive.

Exactly the same with charts.

Some will never overcome this hurdle because they hide away from what needs to be done to create an edge. This is the self development part. To progress you need to be honset with yourself, and the truth is something that not everyone wants to hear. From this point on, they search in other areas to try to find this edge (normally mechanical system trading). This is based on past parameters which can change at any given time. Hence most (small) edges will disappear as soon as they are found.

If you focus on yourself then you are constantly evolving, just as the market is, hence you will create an edge based on the "moment", and you can adapt to the current moment because you are not rigid.

Companies that can not adapt go bust, others (such as Apple at the moment) evolve. Same goes for traders whom came and go.
 
Top