frugi said:
That was a good call Soc. As spotted by Chartman, 32 and 64 are rather magic on the Dow, in that there is often S/R or a reversal close to these numbers more times than a random distribution would allow.
By sweeping I assume you mean the sweeping up of contracts from weak hands and frightened retail bulls who bought too early and can't take any more pain?
If so I am interested as to how you knew that this was happening, as opposed to, say, an imminent continuation of the down trend. I attach a one minute chart of the Dow future YM. I hope the P&V patterns are still clear despite the irksome presence of stabilisers and annotations.
Did the volume patterns at 17:49 and 17:59 to 18:03 give the clue?
I saw a selling climax then a lower low to 32 (at 18:00 time pivot) on less - but still relatively high - volume. Often this "volume divergence" phenomenon is more pronounced, i.e the 'second' climax volume bar, at the low, is less then 2/3 of the length of the first climax bar, but on this occasion it was only a little shorter, perhaps indicating real buying pressure as opposed to a mere lack of new sellers?
After a selling climax of the former variety the following price action is often flattish, with retest(s) of the low, but this time the higher volume pattern together with the time of day and price level pointed to a possible fast V type reversal, but this was a guess not a definite "Oh they're sweeping now let's get long" judgement and I didn't personally go long, though had I more skill I might have done with confidence.
Your, or anybody else's comments would be welcome. Thank you and best regards.
Hello Frugi, first of all congratulations on being appointed a moderator. I would like to take this opportunity to wish you well in your new post. I am confident you will do a very good job of it.
In the above post you refer to the second call.
The first call I was very reluctant to make last night because I have taken Chartman's advice with regard to making predictions in public.
So therefore as today's outcome at the open and subsequent fall and to the level was already evident to me, I did not want to upset anyone and therefore restricted myself to giving humurous veiled clues to all of you before last night's close but in a way that I could not be accused of futurologising the event.
This is also as a measure of self protection as I am not willing to be pilloried for giving results in advance. Also I cannot and will not allow anyone to accuse me of giving investment advice.
That was the first call and bottom pick. In my circle we call laying an egg an event that is imminent whose outcome is known in advance but whos exact start point in future time is difficult to forecast in net present if one is not correctly "tuned" or if there is interference with the "incoming inference".
The second call was done because of the behaviour of the price as the action showed a propensity to develop.
On this occasion it was done using the cash market live, without charts running at all. It is as a consequence of having a complete mastery / famitiliarity wiith price and volume development.
What I am telling you is very advanced and is beyond a chart, and I have no intention of boring the audience with explanations, which in mechanical terms are not explainable, and only apply to check in real time the instant that the price level is forseen. So you see that my use of a chart is very different to everybody elses.
The concept of sweeping is not what you assume it is. It relates to the manner in which the price is progressed or retarded involving the use of time in non linear mode. The result as recorded on a chart displaying volume would illustrate this in mechanical form.This is the differece between attending a concert for example against hearing the music recorded on a CD or tape.
That is as far as I am able and willing to explain publicly.
Kind Regards and I am pleased you like it and that you find it interesting.