darktone
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,019
- Likes
- 1,086
Thats a key point imo! Scaling in and averaging down are very different.We should differentiate between averaging-down and scaling-in , as long as scaling-in is a part of your trading plan -without risking more money- then its ok , averaging-down as a revenge tech is totally different story , so instead of trading 300p/p why not space his entries with smaller stakes to get a better entry price ? ofcourse he needs a predetermined plan , its dangerous yes but he's already trading @ 300p/p , why not trade much smaller then add later ... ?
If your desired position size is 3 units, and you buy 3 times at a size of 1unit, at lower / better prices. Thats scaling in.
If you add more 'unplanned' size thats averaging down imo. Not good.
Adding even more size after the reason for the trade has ceased to exist. Really not good!
Quadrupling size and measuring your 'risk' with normal stops (in part) in front of a number in a thin market. Doomberg thread! :clover: