Is there an affiliate link in some above posts????????????????.
Is there an affiliate link in some above posts????????????????.
I'm sorry but it is the case.
The broker has nothing to do with it.
Any or all of the following mean you are considered to be a financial business:
If you control someone elses money, accept money from someone else,
trade on their behalf, run a collective investment scheme and so on.
To be classed as business activity, it must be carried on 'by way of business'.
That means if you accept a cut or charge for your time, or even just
server costs, it is a business, like it or not, no ifs, buts or maybes.
http://www.fca.org.uk/firms/about-authorisation/do-i-need-to-be-authorised
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/younginvestors/06/investingforfriends.asp
Well, we shall have to agree to disagree. If you think that you are acting as a business then you will have to set up a business and register it accordingly, you will also have to register yourself with the FCA as a business as well as an individual. You will have to appoint certain individuals to cover the Controlled Function roles of your business, i.e. Director, Compliance Oversight, Money Laundering Reporting Officer, Trader etc. all of whom have to be approved by the FCA. These individuals will need to prove they are competent and suitable for the role in question and will have to provide details for at least the last 5 years of their employment. You will need to have sufficient capital backing and submit reports to the FCA twice yearly. If you are holding “Client Money” then you will also have to abide by the FCA CASS regs.
I think you have misinterpreted the FCA regulations as I am sure the FCA would not require all of the above for you to trade on you and three of your friends behalf. From the way you described your situation you are effectively running an investment club for which you do not have to be regulated. It’s the broker that is providing an OTC product and service and it is they that need to be regulated. There are a number of organisations that provide assistance with setting up investment clubs and I would suggest that you search online for information regarding this.
Well, we shall have to agree to disagree. If you think that you are acting as a business then you will have to set up a business and register it accordingly, you will also have to register yourself with the FCA as a business as well as an individual. You will have to appoint certain individuals to cover the Controlled Function roles of your business, i.e. Director, Compliance Oversight, Money Laundering Reporting Officer, Trader etc. all of whom have to be approved by the FCA. These individuals will need to prove they are competent and suitable for the role in question and will have to provide details for at least the last 5 years of their employment. You will need to have sufficient capital backing and submit reports to the FCA twice yearly. If you are holding “Client Money” then you will also have to abide by the FCA CASS regs.
I think you have misinterpreted the FCA regulations as I am sure the FCA would not require all of the above for you to trade on you and three of your friends behalf. From the way you described your situation you are effectively running an investment club for which you do not have to be regulated. It’s the broker that is providing an OTC product and service and it is they that need to be regulated. There are a number of organisations that provide assistance with setting up investment clubs and I would suggest that you search online for information regarding this.
People must have been successful to get this exemption somehow ?
Just wondering what Alpari want me to state to be able to open an PAMM account with them.
I fully understand that we need to abide by the rules and regulations but somehow there are ways this can be done to prevent a very costly process of applying for licence for at least 1,5k
About sums it up for me.Even then, you can still have a not for profit business.
On a serious note, for those whose trading skills have attracted attention of friends and family - why not just get them to give you he money, stick it in your account and trade it? Give them profits on an agreed or ad hoc basis - whatever you all decide - just don't document anything. Surely that keeps within both the spirit and the letter of the law?
The regulatory framework and rules were presumably formulated for professional concerns where large amounts are sought or actively canvassed for and where fees and profit allocations are conducted as a business rather than as a consortium, syndicate or pool.
Completely agree with you on that one, its just a matter if you want to start in this business and want to offer people a security of that the funds are never touched only trading on their account you need to start somewhere.
Thats the thing i have got funding, but need a smooth system to execute my trades on hence Im looking to open PAMM.
Im going to give Alpari a call and ask them if he can point me in some sort of direction here before I apply for an account with them formally.
All these sound lame to me. Of course, regulation has been made a safe heaven, but is it? The reality is this, when you lose your money, regulatory bodies will go after the culprit, but will you get your money back? NO. I have been following these scam cases for a while now and I have not seen any trader who raised hands to say "I got my money back"!. It is even worse these days, FCA, AUSIC and NSA are all failing. There is no longer any effort to keep brokers in check. So, what is the need to demand for regulation these days. After all, there is no 100% fund safety in forex, regulation or not. So, please, trade/invest at your own risk. Isn't this what the broker tells us nowadays?