Fine,
my concern was that relatively inexperienced users would jump on this as a money generator, without realising there's a bit more to it than watching two lines cross. Being experienced you'll be putting that prior knowledge in, almost unconsciously, that newbies can't call on.
I use ADX myself, but in a different setting - using it to attempt to confirm trending behaviour to avoid whipsaws, notably in the Parabolic-SAR. Distinct similarities exist, I also use the DI/DM info to decide if the trend is going the right way as part of the test - I use a lower value than normal for ADX as a 'possible trend in place' down at 12 (14 day EMAs all round), plus the ADX has to be rising, plus the direction info has to match the trade direction. This isn't intended to pick 'good' PSAR signals, but to reject the bad ones.
my concern was that relatively inexperienced users would jump on this as a money generator, without realising there's a bit more to it than watching two lines cross. Being experienced you'll be putting that prior knowledge in, almost unconsciously, that newbies can't call on.
I use ADX myself, but in a different setting - using it to attempt to confirm trending behaviour to avoid whipsaws, notably in the Parabolic-SAR. Distinct similarities exist, I also use the DI/DM info to decide if the trend is going the right way as part of the test - I use a lower value than normal for ADX as a 'possible trend in place' down at 12 (14 day EMAs all round), plus the ADX has to be rising, plus the direction info has to match the trade direction. This isn't intended to pick 'good' PSAR signals, but to reject the bad ones.