0
0FXTrader0
Sports gambling sites do not have a *
*depending on one's individual circumstances
*depending on one's individual circumstances
I doubt there has been any successful case against a punter that only trades.So name a case where someone has been taxed on spread betting profits, please?
On the flip side, this would make spread betting losses tax-deductable no? Again, looking for evidence.
Incorrect.I would always fade a spread bettor's opinion. Traders I have known have had a limited company or traded for a prop firm. I don't know of any spread bettors coining the markets all I hear is how the majority are in the red.
One of the major reasons for having a ltd was to protect from unlimited losses but now retail rules protect you from this but its still does not mean you have unlimited upside of tax free profits when you achieve this 2-5yrs you will become liable to tax so may as well trade with a reputable cfd provider.
And here’s why:Incorrect.
I have been spreadbetting since 2003, and complete a self assessment tax return each year. There is no requirement to record any income from any betting activity.
should you start a business by offering signals, teaching, or managing accounts then you would be deemed carrying on the trade as you have used your trading as a means to support your business.Spreadbetting providers are bookmakers and are subject to a betting levy on profits from their activities. Suffice to say this is better for the revenue than levying tax on a punter. (The tax rules on all betting activity changed in the early 2000's when Gordon Brown was chancellor and he introduced the betting levy)
I have been spreadbetting since 2003, and complete a self assessment tax return each year. There is no requirement to record any income from any betting activity.
As I have stated previously, as have many others, a retail client (or even a professional under the ESMA categorisation) does not pay tax on SB earnings because of the categorisation of the instrument.
my god 0FX. Read the words. they is professional. they is not gamblers, they is liable, whether they spreadbet or notYou guys have just put J.P. Morgan, GS, Citi and all the major wealth managers out of business why would any sensible HNWI invest in CFD's or the underlying when they can just choose their favourite spread bet provider and invest tax free 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼
The individuals investing with them not the banks themselvesmy god 0FX. Read the words. they is professional. they is not gamblers, they is liable, whether they spreadbet or not
my apologies 0FX. indeed why not. primarily because they can't do it themselves. I manage money on behalf of individuals, they have money yet not the faintest idea what to do with it. not a clue with what a sipp or isa or other tax efficient means are out there. they wouldn't know a trend if it smacked them on the nose. they believe still that buy and hold is the only way to go. so they place it in the hands of professionals thinking they know something they dont.The individuals investing with them not the banks themselves
of course not. spreadbetting still incurs charges. the charge itself can outweigh the gain over the long termAnyone who could save tax would save tax there financial advisor would put them into spread betting even if they don't know what a trend is. If it was tax free which it is not for regular winners or large investors.
they are over the short term yes. but if I wanted dividend income within my portfolio? its just one tool which I think you perhaps beginning to come round to, but its just one of many. anyway, fun as its been I sincerely hope you read through this thread again, with a more open mind and realise sometimes that because everyone is saying the same thing, its not collective mass histeria or herd mentality. its because it is.The costs of spread betting are very low and the tax advantage would enable clients of e.g GS PWM to do there trades but guess what they don't offer it, gap in the market or telling you something