Splitlink said:
I'd go further. I don't think that any indicator based on averages is any better than using an average itself , and averages are simpler to construct. I believe that it is all there, in the plain bar, or candle, chart. The fact that I can be as blind as a bat doesn't change it 😕 A medium average to give an idea of how the trend is going, is all I use, but I am going thrugh a unsuccessful period at present- good job that I seem to be OK on keeping losses under control. The trouble with bad patches, as far as I am concerned, is that I am inclined to try new methods- a waste of time, in my view.
What do you think of an MACD signal, used in conjunction with pullbacks? If averages rise, buy on pullback. If average falls, sell on pullbacks?
Split
Hi,
Not sure if the question was directed at me Split but I shall answer it anyway.
To begin with I'm learning all the time myself so what I post here may not be correct but its what I've experienced. Also, I just want to clarify my trading strategy / style as this may have some influence on my answer.
With the exception of buying stocks which I purchase after detailed research and then apply the "buy & hold" strategy holding them for the medium to long-term, the remaining part of my trading is via Spread Betting. I got into SBetting as a bit of fun but after a little while realised that by placing so many trades on a regular basis and more importantly monitoring them, I feel that my overall understanding on how the Stock Market works has improved.
With regard to Sbetting, I swing trade and hold positions open from anything from between 3 days to 3 weeks - maybe longer if the trend is looking good & I'm making a nice profit!!!
🙂
Personally, I have never really got to grips with the MACD. I understand what it is and how it works but never spent long enough with it to see whether it is effective (for me). I do use something similar and that is Chick Goslins indicators. The reason for this choice is that I read the book, loved his approach and as I trade only bullish / bearish stocks (which are in an established trend) find that his methodology suitable. However, I only use his indicators when looking for an exit as I find that for entry his indicators are not that effective. Again IMO.
For Entry, I try to keep things simple. I look for pullbacks and monitor VOLUME very carefully. I think the relationship between price & volume is crucial and that trading price alone is like only knowing "half the story", again IMO.
Recently I have been looking for some more visual way of showing the relationship between price & volume and consequently have started to use the Accumulation / Distribution line. I prefer it to say OBV as it takes into account where the close is compared to the high & low for that particular day. I read a book on VSA a year or so ago which also commented on the important of this relationship.
Interestingly, I am still looking for another indicator to help me with entry for confirmation and was hoping that maybe the RSI could be used. But as I wrote in an earlier post, it doesn't seem that effective in trending markets.
All the best,
Chorlton