Robertral,
I would have to disagree, or possibly I'm not explaining myself clearly.
Shadow gamma, to my mind refers to the change in gamma with regard to implied volatility. That is to say the implied volatility is lower than you would expect.
One method would used to avoid unpleasant surprises or poorly balanced hedges, would be to calculate upside gamma, and downside gamma with the implied volatility, and then again with the expected future volatility. The second "gamma" becomes an expected scenario with the no change-in-volatility scenario.
Does that bring us onto the same page?
Cheers d998
I would have to disagree, or possibly I'm not explaining myself clearly.
Your def of shadow gamm is not tech correct......shadow gamma takse into account a move on the vol surface when a move in the underlying moves, so in affect its not the change in delta wrt to vol (dDELTA/dVOL is not shadow gamma).......
Shadow gamma, to my mind refers to the change in gamma with regard to implied volatility. That is to say the implied volatility is lower than you would expect.
One method would used to avoid unpleasant surprises or poorly balanced hedges, would be to calculate upside gamma, and downside gamma with the implied volatility, and then again with the expected future volatility. The second "gamma" becomes an expected scenario with the no change-in-volatility scenario.
Does that bring us onto the same page?
Cheers d998