Day trading freedom course! 1000 per day? look at live video's.

cu2

Active member
Messages
190
Likes
4
It is not expencive and this guy makes 1000 per day, which is what he is claiming.
Take a look at his live trade video's. Could it be a simulation video or is it for real?

Do you have it?
http://www.daytradingfreedom.com/videos/

Looks like he is using pre market opening gap on Nasdaq stocks.

If anyone has his course please let me know. I would like to know if he's for real or do the video's only show his good days:eek:
 
His video's only show his bad days. Would you really expect anything different ?Paul

Yes, as in his video's Halvey says "Only 900 today o'well that was a bad day but better than a kick in the teeth"
Is this guy sooo kool? He seems very genuine to me. :( Besides is there no honest one out there?
 
is there no honest one out there?
I am a top poker professional and play in all the major tournaments*. I have an amazing, personal system for playing poker that makes me win. I win tournaments because I use this system and no-one else does. I'll sell my system to anyone for a small amount. When my secret is out and lots of people use my system, my winnings will go down, maybe to nothing.

Why am I selling it?

a) I'm tired of winning lots of money and want to win less
b) I've had an altruistic turn and want others to win at my expense for their sake
c) I'd make more selling it than I do using it
d) It's a pile of fabricated statistics, I'd never use it myself, and I'm a conman

* Not true.
 
Why am I selling it?

a) I'm tired of winning lots of money and want to win less
b) I've had an altruistic turn and want others to win at my expense for their sake
c) I'd make more selling it than I do using it
d) It's a pile of fabricated statistics, I'd never use it myself, and I'm a conman



I think there could be another reason

e) I have a winning system and it makes me money BUT it takes a large amount of self-discipline and mental fortitude to follow it everyday. I have to place my money on the line to make more money and it can be emotionally draining. Everyday I start from scratch not knowing whether I will make £500 or lose £500...........I know I'll sell it and watch the cheques come thorough the letterbox instead - it's a lot less stressful than trading for a living !

Daz
 
  • Like
Reactions: TWI
I think there could be another reason

e) I have a winning system and it makes me money BUT it takes a large amount of self-discipline and mental fortitude to follow it everyday. I have to place my money on the line to make more money and it can be emotionally draining. Everyday I start from scratch not knowing whether I will make £500 or lose £500...........I know I'll sell it and watch the cheques come thorough the letterbox instead - it's a lot less stressful than trading for a living !

Daz
Daz, good one.

e) It actually works but I can't hack it

I wonder what the distribution of a, b, c, d, e is in reality. I don't think a poll here would reveal it :)
 
Daz, good one.

e) It actually works but I can't hack it

I wonder what the distribution of a, b, c, d, e is in reality. I don't think a poll here would reveal it :)

I don't believe e) EVER exists. If it works you dont need to sell it. nuff said.
 
I don't believe e) EVER exists. If it works you dont need to sell it. nuff said.

Hoggums, I was wondering how can you make the above statement with 100% certainty ?

Surely there must have been at least one (honest/genuine) successful trader who woke up one morning and realised his 'bottle' had gone and couldn't pull the trigger anymore ?

Maybe then with a large house, wife with expensive taste, kids in private school, friends to keep impressing, his only option was to go down the seminar / book / course selling route to bring in some income.

Daz
 
I read this e-book a few years ago now and I disagree with most of the comments posted so far.

On the negative side, this book won't give an experienced trader an insight into any new trading strategies that are not already out there with a quick google. It also probably doesnt make clear in the sales jargon just how much work would be required to turn the techniques into a winning formula.

However, the book is a very well written and easy to follow introduction to technical analysis for those that are new to the subject and is perfectly acceptable as a 'back-to-basics' reference text for the more experienced trader. It also discusses a subject not often covered in TA books- methods (albeit basic) of finding stocks that are likely to have sufficient price movements to make the TA worthwhile.

As for the price- i definitely got it far cheaper than it is currently selling. Is it worth the current price? Well, if you are an inexperienced technical trader that doesnt want to waste time surfing around and have the cash spare, then you could certainly buy worse information for that money...it isnt a SYSTEM per se, more of an EDUCATION that starts you on the long road to being able you to create your own systems one day...
 
I read this e-book a few years ago now and I disagree with most of the comments posted so far.

On the negative side, this book won't give an experienced trader an insight into any new trading strategies that are not already out there with a quick google. It also probably doesnt make clear in the sales jargon just how much work would be required to turn the techniques into a winning formula.

However, the book is a very well written and easy to follow introduction to technical analysis for those that are new to the subject and is perfectly acceptable as a 'back-to-basics' reference text for the more experienced trader. It also discusses a subject not often covered in TA books- methods (albeit basic) of finding stocks that are likely to have sufficient price movements to make the TA worthwhile.

As for the price- i definitely got it far cheaper than it is currently selling. Is it worth the current price? Well, if you are an inexperienced technical trader that doesnt want to waste time surfing around and have the cash spare, then you could certainly buy worse information for that money...it isnt a SYSTEM per se, more of an EDUCATION that starts you on the long road to being able you to create your own systems one day...
Still, Harvey Walsh is a fabricated identity used by Henry Doyle. Why?

Maybe because he took chapters out of other renowned books, mixed them around and made a book, calling it his own. Maybe he's not a trader at all and pretends to be to sell his plagiarized course. People simply have to come to this forum and ask what book to start with as a newbee or simply go to Amazon and search for top rated trading books.

Buy the course if you don't wanna waste time on the Internet? Is that your selling pitch or did Walsh's affiliate program taught you that? Why not say Harvey is such a great guy and give oh so much and asks oh so little! Or, Harvey is from East-London, notoriously known for it's swindlers and scammers.

YouTube - Harvey Walsh is a SCAMMER!!!
 
I'm not vouching for the personal integrity of the vendor... I have no idea what his job is and if he uses falsifications to sell his course or not.

I am just trying to provide an honest assesment of who the book will be useful for and if you read my post I make it quite clear that it isnt going to be handy for everyone.

As for the accusations of plagiarism- its effectively a textbook for new traders written to consolidate information thats already out there, although it is fair to say that the sales jargon does probably misrepresent this to a degree. Your accusations of outright plagiarism however would be like saying that a school physics text book is plagiarsing Issac Newton- it isnt, it is just trying to avoid people new to the subject having to wade through 'principia mathematica', just like this guys course is trying to avoid people having to go to the original source of all the material.
 
As for the accusations of plagiarism- its effectively a textbook for new traders written to consolidate information thats already out there, although it is fair to say that the sales jargon does probably misrepresent this to a degree. Your accusations of outright plagiarism however would be like saying that a school physics text book is plagiarsing Issac Newton- it isnt, it is just trying to avoid people new to the subject having to wade through 'principia mathematica', just like this guys course is trying to avoid people having to go to the original source of all the material.
Because summing-up some readily available material from the net and putting it in a booklet, selling it for $147... well, this still sounds like a SCAM to me. The mere fact he's hiding his true identity may... and I did say MAY.. because he simply copied chapters here and there from books, seen as mandatory for the beginner by real traders.

Opposed to Newton, Walsh is NOT recognized by his peers as a beacon of light in his field. In fact, Walsh doesn't exist at all. Because I merely theorized about a reasonable explanation, Henry Doyle is hiding behind the 'Walsh' identity, doesn't make it true. Just like Newton, I provided a theory that could shed some light on Doyle's motivations to do what he's doing. So, accusations of outright plagiarism? Cut the dramatics, please!

Why do you know Sir Isaac Newton? Because these school textbooks always refer to him when it comes to among others, his theory on Gravitation. Not to forget that most theories are already centuries old and thus are not protected anymore by copyright laws. But a true scientist doesn't hide behind such laws in the first place, since he/she dares his/her peers to disprove their theory to come to an even better understanding of our world. Publishing "Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica" or just some chapters and not referring to Newton and suggesting YOU where the brilliant mind behind it.... is plagiarism! And a plain SCAM of you have the audacity to sell it for $147! ........again, I'm not saying Doyle is doing it, I'm merely theorizing!

Unlike Newton, who wasn't hiding behind a facade of imaginary characters, Doyle is pretending among others to be Harvey Walsh, who is supposed to be a successful day trader. Doyle probably has some basic knowledge, but certainly not the equivalent of an "Isaac Newton" in the field of day trading. Could we classify him as a master day trader and worthy of teaching the beginner for $147, just by the video's he's showing us on Youtube? I think not!

I've been watching Walsh for some time and know he now has an affiliate program running. Since then, I guess that, if someone comes out in defense of Walsh's operation, blatantly disputing the facts or promoting the product for making your life so much easier or even promoting Walsh, because he's such a nice guy, giving so much and asking so little!(still ROFL) ..... the affiliates came to the rescue. Again, I'm merely theorizing where evidence is still nonexistent, to come as close to the truth as possible!
 
Yep

One word to sum up the digitally-distorted voice of "Harvey Walsh"...lol....FRAUD.

Yes I do think we are all agreed on that. Please read the thread thoughly you will find enough evidence of it.
 
Hi,
I don't post that often but i want comment on this;
At first it all looked trustworthy so i bought the course. After a couple of questions through email i asked him about the fake outs, he told me that i was not reading the tape right, which was weird because i read his course and watched his member videos and did exactly as he did.

In almost all my mails i have sent,i did him an offer of 1000 dollars for a live session over skype for a morning session. He never gave a reaction on this. I asked this a couple of times in several mails... He always replied to my questions but NOT the question about a live session.
I always found that a bit strange to answer a mail of some questions regarding his course and not answer about a livesession! It looks like he avoids the questions about a meeting.
 
One other thing i would like to add to my previous comment:

I watched his video from yesterday and saw that in one trade, i believe it was drys, which is not quiet a big volume player, as he was trying to buy the rest of his shares back. This took about 3 seconds. Nasdaq has superfast fills as distinct from the NYSE.
I know Esignal's reply modus and it only fills you when a trade real is comming through. So THAT explains the late fill on DRYS. Otherwise he was filled instantly.
 
One other thing i would like to add to my previous comment:

I watched his video from yesterday and saw that in one trade, i believe it was drys, which is not quiet a big volume player, as he was trying to buy the rest of his shares back. This took about 3 seconds. NASDAQ has super fast fills as distinct from the NYSE.
I know eSignal's reply modus and it only fills you when a trade real is coming through. So THAT explains the late fill on DRYS. Otherwise he was filled instantly.
So.... are you saying what I think you're saying.. that is, he's a pretender. A fake! A dirty little lying $hit! A swindling mofo that sounds legit, but is just some Internet marketeer, shoving some worthless product?

Did you learn something from his course? Also which books about trading, stock market etc. did you read before doing his course? Not that I'm questioning you, but I'm just curious if you found some of the courses material a repetition of what already has been published in other books or papers?

Thanks (y)
 
Dirty rotten scoundrel

So.... are you saying what I think you're saying.. that is, he's a pretender. A fake! A dirty little lying $hit! A swindling mofo that sounds legit, but is just some Internet marketeer, shoving some worthless product?

Did you learn something from his course? Also which books about trading, stock market etc. did you read before doing his course? Not that I'm questioning you, but I'm just curious if you found some of the courses material a repetition of what already has been published in other books or papers?

Thanks (y)

Vanitas ! Vanity, all is vanity saith the preacher:)
 
Top