As I was saying the other day very few people make more than some spotty oik working in McDonalds.
It is a myth that this sort of scenario is even remotely possible. Once you get to a certain level of size being traded your ability to execute the size wanted would not be possible without huge slippage.
It reminds me of the nonsensical claims being made by horse racing systems sellers where compounding calculations were used to make it appear that everyone who bought the system would become millionaires.
30 pips a day "on average"?
Or just 30 pips a day?
If you just go for 30 pips, and STOP, you're in for some trouble.
The flip side becomes, how many pips do you lose and stop for the day?
If you want to average 30 pips a day, you would necessarily go for more than 30 pips a day, so that you can ride out the losing days.
For example, if you just go for 30 and stop, and stop at 30 loss, for every day lost, you need a winning day to break even.
So, in a week, 5 days, if you have 1 losing day, and 4 winning, (-30, + 120), you have 90 pips, thats 18 average a day.
If you want 30 pips a day average, and have 1 losing day a week (I'm dreaming here), you need to make 150 nett in the winning 3 days, ie 50 a day.
Thats gives you lose 50, win 200, (50 pips a day for 4 days), giving a nett 150 for the week, averaging 30 a day.
Reality is, winning trades clump together as market conditions are in-line with your rules, losing trades clump together as market state is sub-optimal for your rules, and most of the time, you grind out wins/losses, as market is neither good nor bad.
I think we all started out with these fantastical spreadsheets in the early days.
Reality is more challenging.
(try adding a column using the random function. if value (between 0 and 1) is greater than 0.8 its a loss, and if less then its a win. then either add or subtract accordingly. you get to a million, but it hovers around 90 weeks)
Eur usd has trilion a day volume , slippage only occurs on losing trades which can be around 20 % of all trading of skilled traders.Not all losinig trades have slippage , and $5m eur usd is filled on single clicks.
eh? say again?
Peter
Lulz
Sounds like he's trading with FXCM.
The Ctrl, c and v keys must be getting pretty worn out now 15.
Billions aside for a second it is pretty clear there is only one thing being compounded here and unfortunately on multiple other threads.........
interesting thread.
I trade at TINY stakes.
Over the last 6 months or so I appear to have been getting some real consistency.
My average pips per month isn't fantastic. I seem to be averaging about 100 pips per month (whereas from what I can gather, the better traders here are doing that amount of pips in a day or 2)
I'M ok with that for now, though. My only concern at the moment is
''what if the market suddenly changes(as you often hear it does) and my method stops working, and i'll have to spend another 4 years, not earning any money from trading, trying to find another method that works''.
please look at my thread:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/forex/152898-gbpusd-action-today-6.html
Eur usd has trilion a day volume , slippage only occurs on losing trades which can be around 20 % of all trading of skilled traders.Not all losinig trades have slippage , and $5m eur usd is filled on single clicks.
Forex Market Overview
No real comparison with horse racing systems , as trading systems of traders as opposed to gambling systems have very few losses.
eh? say again?
Peter
It is very simple , win rate is 60% , breakeven is 20 % and loss ratio is 20 %, just trade when there are trends.
Eur usd has trilion a day volume , slippage only occurs on losing trades which can be around 20 % of all trading of skilled traders.Not all losinig trades have slippage , and $5m eur usd is filled on single clicks.
How does that explain the quote below?
I get slippage mainly on stop orders , on losing trades , limit orders have rare slippage if any it is positive slippage on winning trades.
What is there to explain?
So your limits always fill first time?
And if they don't, what then, market order, or place new limit?
In between the first limit not being filled and then placing a second market
or revised limit, could quite easily result in a worse price than your original limit order.
So although not strictly slippage, in the sense of that particular order, fill price
is nevertheless worse than it would have been.
That applies to all trades, entry or exit.