I'm shocked, genuinely shocked..:-0
Black Swan
Why do you continually feel the need to run to Peter from CMC's defense? All you're trying to do here is discredit any member who asks decent questions that Peter has tried hard to avoid answering.
Do you think you're fooling anyone here? Give it up.
I will repeat myself because you seem to have a convenient memory - the only reason I can see that CMC have a cumbersome multi-click platform now rather than the decent platform (with true 1 click trading) they had on their previous platform (Market Maker) is to deter short term traders (you know, the ones that can pull in good amounts of profits in short periods of time) because even though they state they hedge every trade, this proves they don't because they must be losing, well in fact they are, otherwise why would they ask short term traders to leave?
Believe me or not, but as I type this here now, I can swear it has, and continues to happen.
One guy I personally know (not an online friend, one who I have met and have continued contact with and seen his wealth first hand) used to trade the S&P on the Market Maker, one instrument that he learned like the back of his hand, nothing else which he studied for a full year learning every twist and turn. He used to trade large amounts per point after building his account up and on average would pull in 3% per day.
Now if you compound this amount over a year with a starting capital of 5k and you will see serious amounts of profits. Let me help you out, it's over £6 million.
When he got to just £100pp he got asked to leave and his account was closed, reason? They said he must work for a Prop firm or a Bank. Go figure. So what he did was to bite the bullet, and he started trading direct through ECN and has got a great accountant and has now own many homes, one abode in a specific island for tax purposes because he was sick as he put it 'of the underhand decieving games that the 21st centuary bucket shops of the 1930's do to take the money off the average trader'. He paid Tax to get to the point of reduced Tax status, but he got there never the less. He would have got there alot faster if the spreadbetting firms had not messed him around along the way. As he put it, 'if they were half as smart as they think they are, they would have shadowed his trades'. But the point is they don't, which concludes that spread betting profits are reliant on the majority of traders who lose...95%? The odds are in their favour which is
greatly increased if they kick out the winners who eat greatly into their profits.
Now I have spent some time on this subject, I've given you background to why I'm asking my questions, I hope you can see my points are valid and will deter from anymore de-railing tactics.