You're on the ball Peter...
OK, I was waiting for an email before I blogged a reply.
The basics are that you can check what rate you're being charged on the demo platform.
Enter a position, hold it overnight, then click on Bet Financing Cost for the overnight period in question. You will then see a list of the overnight positions with an interest rate and cost value against each.
As an example, holding a UK stock had an interest rate of 2.55% last night.
From talking to Michelle, this is derived from a reference rate which approximates to overnight LIBOR (it's an average of overnight rates and other rates polled during the day) PLUS 2%.
In your previous blog to kalott, "Nice thing also is that all balances are netted off so you only pay finance on net borrowings. I believe we are only spread company that does this." As someone who has not been familiar with sb practices, this suggests a single notional 10k position with a 10k cash balance = no net borrowings (regardless of margin %). Seems like that would be market leading, but is not what CMC does.
The actual position is that finance charges are only levied on the notional minus margin. ie 10k position, 1k margin, finance charged on 9k.
If there is any distinction between yourselves and competitors on this, it could be that a competitor is charging finance on the whole 10k, which to me sounds fraudulent.
I will open demo positions for other products - a commodity, a US stock, plus shorts of these and a couple of FX pairs today and check the rates that they attract overnight.
There is an explanation of the principles of how the Bet Borrowing Cost is constructed on your website (
http://www.cmcmarkets.co.uk/spread-betting/information), but I could find no indication of the haircut/loading rates, except on external websites which suggest that the rate is LIBOR + 3%. Would make sense to put this on your website rather than be pictured as charging higher rates by eg comparison sites.
So, in summary, the amount on which you charge financing is higher than I was hoping for, but probably in line with competitors (even if some charge on the full notional position, your 90-95% of notional net of margin won't make that much difference).
The loading rate at 2% for stocks is tied lowest with 2 other providers of the ones I've reviewed.
The fact that the finance charge is separately itemised for each position is a plus, as is the fact that you don't adjust entry prices (except for dividends/corporate actions).
Hi Uchiki
Michelle told me you spoke to her today. I hope everything was explained to your satisfaction. Let me know if you need any more assistance.
regards Peter