Hi D70 you certainly may make a few comments, make as many comments as you want they are always appreciated.
I don't want to sound like I have it all figured out and come across arrogant or stubborn, I am fully aware of my short comings but I don't agree with your comments 100%
I know my last post seemed a bit emotional but I wouldn't describe myself as a very emotional person, most people who know me would likely describe me as quite robotic in nature. I think yesterday I got frustrated that I am trading what should be a simple method and am making it very complicated for myself somehow, add to that the ****ty day at work I had and hey presto. It' s not to do with any given outcome, I look at my stats over the last few months and I consistently have more losers than winners in what is a run-away bull market, if there is any time I should be making money it's right now, it's not going to get any easier.
I feel that this comes down to the mechanics of the method, I am taking trades which I have been warned are higher risk but take them anyway because I think I know better and want to prove it to myself. Then I don't take trades which meet my criteria because I have some strange bias for shallower swings and avoid anything with a bit of depth because I think it will never reach it's target.
I hear you on the loaded coin, Trading in the Zone is one of my favourite books, but I remember Douglas saying before you read this book you need a method with an edge, I think I am still working out what my edge is and until I do no amount of money management and psychology is going to make me profitable, I need to have a loaded coin in the first place.
I do keep an eye on my successful trades once I close them to see how they would have done if I trailed them and the results are not convincing but it might be an idea for the future.
I am only going for longs, it's a bull market, Livermore had a few things to say on that subject
. I am open to taking counter-trend trades once I figure out a few of the other loose-ends with my method.
Thanks again for the reply.