Windowsill
Well-known member
- Messages
- 305
- Likes
- 39
I don't really understand your point about moving stops to break even. If you know where it will likely run into trouble, and it starts reversing there, then you better not be taking a loss. If you mean simply that, break even is an arbitrary point, and I might move my stop to ahead of break even, then fine.
I think it is nonsense to say that a trader moving his stop up to break even or better is going to lose in the long run because he is playing the P/L. No offence, just my two cents.
I don't know if TD comes to this conclusion through experience or backtesting/forward testing etc. I have though imo.
If you spend a lot of time crunching numbers the inescapable truth in my opinion is, you either have no stops or you have technical stops. You certainly don't keep leaping to break even and you don't trail positions, if you want to make money.
Stops should be placed so that if they are taken out...........you should be seriously considering to reverse the postion because the market mood has changed. In fact you probably should only close out a position if you really believe the market has changed direction....Ie the thought process for exit is pretty much the same as for the entry.
Although mechanical systems are generally pretty hopeless the search for the holy grail does make you examine such things as stop placement...many systems collapse when a stop is added!!