chiefchimpanzee
Established member
- Messages
- 949
- Likes
- 1
I agree with Arabianights. Do it!
They all have to make a profit why the big deal ?
If they don’t make a profit then they don't exist and if they don’t exist then you don’t have a place to trade tax free
They are a company after all!
Profit is the name of the game.
P.S.
Simon - if you want prospreads to take off - do these two things:
1. Make all orders actually submit to the real market. Allow traders to register with the exchange, get an ITM, receive rebates, etc.
2. Go to pennies a round trip above say 10k lots/month.
You'll be doing ten million round trips a month within a quarter if you do this.
How lazy are you lot? It's all going to be here somewhere: http://www.londoncapitalgroup.com/investorinfo.html
You even get to see how much Simon earns if you want
on page 10 - it says their client numbers have risen to 741.
Yep 741!
Edit: Nevermind that seems to confusingly refer to something else. Not sure what though
Found it: it was 51,240 UK SB accounts in 2009.
I don't know if that includes Prospreads (since that is in Gibraltar).
I am guessing that it does not include the white label partners (Tradefair et al).
0.5M FSB trades per month.
39% of total clients were active during the year
Average trades per day rose 14% to 23,975 (2008:20,967).
CS offers both spreadbetting and CFD's on the same platform. What is the difference really apart from the tax free on spreadbetting? Why would someone decide to trade CFD's instead, are there any advantages? Just want to know what was the purpose of CS introducing these CFD's?
Despite all this talk, no one including CS has shown us any proof that this latency trading is actually possible and happening regularly in this day and age. I'm not saying it cannot happen at all but to be able to make a trading system out of it is quite far fetched. But I suppose from a spreadbet company point of view you get suspicious anyway when you see aggressive scalpers taking money from you. There is a difference between a trader who waits for latency (good luck) and one who does many scalps and the spreadbet company dont like both and I reckon that's where they get a bit mixed up. A scalper is trading on momentum and does a lot of trades so it's quite possible that they sometimes get ahead of the price move if the platform is slow whether it is intentional or not. And therefore they are more likely to be seen as latency traders. So it is really a platform issue that needs to be addressed but as we see the easy way out for the spreadbet company is to put these traders on dealer confirm for a quick fix.
Tar precisely my point. Their excuse is rubbish. Also the way they deal with honest traders who know how to trade well but might want to stay on the SB platform for tax reasons, is ridiculous.
Simon I'd love for you to clear it up. Do Tradefair and Dealing Desk use your traders too or do they have their own? Was Nick right in saying it was you lot who put me on refer to dealer?
Prospreads
unfortunately the exchanges charge rather more than a few pence per contract.. we must also pay for all the linkages/support/hosting/staff/gaming duty etc etc. Not only this but Prospreads is under Gibraltan 'FSA' rules which are very much more restrictive than European/UK when it comes to Retail clients. All in all it means that costs per client are much heavier (which is probably why there is only one SB company in what, one would have thought, should be a fertile territory)
Tradefair and DD is a white label , they have same address and offices = CS .
I don't think that is strictly correct.
They are "white label partners", and are separate companies, as understand it.
They may use the same dealing-desk/traders, but I'm guessing they have a separate client base.
I think that Tradefair's address is actually the same as Betfair's, of which they are a part.
The annual report of LCG talks about them making these partnership agreements and hoping to hold on to them. This wouldn't be the case if they were really part of CS.
I don't know how the technicalities work, but LCG seems to provide the underlying platform, and then the partners put their own bells and whistles on top.
Perhaps Simon will correct this view if necessary , if he isn't totally fed up of this thread by now.