Hi All,
I was just wondering about a business model for a spread betting company, just a food for thought type thing.
What if you set up a spread betting company that worked in the following way,
You initially set up your exposure as virtually nil, ie on each instrument you always hedge any exsposure that is weighted to the sell/buy side and take your profit from the spread only.
Then you start setting status numbers to each account, say between 1 and 10, 1 for the least profitable account and 10 the most profitable. You would need a good software system to do this but then you could start reducing your 100% hedging by looking at each instrument, your exposure to the sell/buy side and by having a system that could calculate using account status and trade size which side of the trade it might be most attractive not to 100% hedge against?
ie simple equation to calculate using the status of each account, ratio of trade size to simply give a numerical value as to what is statistically the most probable side of the trade not to 100% hedge on?
Also what you could do is with the traders who are profitable on status 9 and 10, or even just the 10 status, you set up another sub team within the spread betting firm that deals with all of these accounts and you for example double the stake when they enter into a trade. You make sure that these accounts are well managed in terms of no requotes, quick fills etc because you want these traders to be more than happy with the spread betting firm, you want to keep them because they are making you money.
It may be some time to build up the model but this model makes it very attractive to have not only big loser accounts but also big winners as well so you could make the firm very attractive to all traders?
Not that i am thinking of setting my own firm up, or even know anything about the real dynamics of a spread betting company, just something that occured to me and wanted others opinion.
cheers all,
Christian
I was just wondering about a business model for a spread betting company, just a food for thought type thing.
What if you set up a spread betting company that worked in the following way,
You initially set up your exposure as virtually nil, ie on each instrument you always hedge any exsposure that is weighted to the sell/buy side and take your profit from the spread only.
Then you start setting status numbers to each account, say between 1 and 10, 1 for the least profitable account and 10 the most profitable. You would need a good software system to do this but then you could start reducing your 100% hedging by looking at each instrument, your exposure to the sell/buy side and by having a system that could calculate using account status and trade size which side of the trade it might be most attractive not to 100% hedge against?
ie simple equation to calculate using the status of each account, ratio of trade size to simply give a numerical value as to what is statistically the most probable side of the trade not to 100% hedge on?
Also what you could do is with the traders who are profitable on status 9 and 10, or even just the 10 status, you set up another sub team within the spread betting firm that deals with all of these accounts and you for example double the stake when they enter into a trade. You make sure that these accounts are well managed in terms of no requotes, quick fills etc because you want these traders to be more than happy with the spread betting firm, you want to keep them because they are making you money.
It may be some time to build up the model but this model makes it very attractive to have not only big loser accounts but also big winners as well so you could make the firm very attractive to all traders?
Not that i am thinking of setting my own firm up, or even know anything about the real dynamics of a spread betting company, just something that occured to me and wanted others opinion.
cheers all,
Christian