Bush or Kerry?

Who would you vote for on November 2?

  • Bush

    Votes: 48 27.9%
  • Kerry

    Votes: 94 54.7%
  • Nader

    Votes: 8 4.7%
  • None of the above!

    Votes: 22 12.8%

  • Total voters
    172
Status
Not open for further replies.
From today's Telegraph

" Democracy is suitable only for the enlightened - which is to say for people who accept the assumptions of the Guardian/BBC world view. If you cannot produce the right result in an election - even after you have been told very clearly by everybody from Robert Redford to Michael Moore what to think - then you are beneath contempt, and we are licensed by the household gods of liberal ideology to call you names. (On Radio 4's News Quiz last week, Jeremy Hardy described Bush and his followers as "stupid, crazy, ignorant, bellicose Christian fundamentalists". Presumably, by BBC logic, this does not constitute bigotry but wit.) "
 
zambuck said:
......perhaps BBC considered the description as a fact....?

Possibly, in which case maybe "prejudice" rather than "bigotry " would give them the benefit of the doubt.
 
twalker said:
and this shows the average IQ of each state and how they voted.
http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm

That's the funniest, scariest thing I've ever seen! I say nobody should be allowed to vote with a IQ of less than 100.

twalker said:
Finally it is interesting to see the first calls in the mainstream media for fairly radical re-alignment of geopolitical relationships.
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,9115,1346011,00.html

Well, if the Brits don't want to be the 51st state any longer, as they have to ask the US govt for the launch codes,(France has its own nuclear deterrent and can nuke anyone it wants), it's time to trash NATO! Controversial, but you know it makes sense. Russia to join EU next!
 
It has deeply saddened me that 18 more American troops were murdered today in the liberation of Fallujah. This must surely stiffen the resolve of the coalition's troops to liberate Fallujah from the tyrannical rule of the Islamic Terrorists. This tragedy today was made ever more poignant by the fact that today is the 11th of the 11th. Lest we never forget troops of the past and troops of the present, as they battle on to rid the world of Evil.
 
Innocents die

TraderPattern said:
It has deeply saddened me that 18 more American troops were murdered today in the liberation of Fallujah.
Even if 18 American tropps have been killed in Fallujah today, it will be a very small fraction of the number of innocent civilians that die in the US attack.

Still trying to understand Bush "logic" - if you kill enough innocent people then the survivors will like you.
 
gcb01 said:
Even if 18 American tropps have been killed in Fallujah today, it will be a very small fraction of the number of innocent civilians that die in the US attack.

Still trying to understand Bush "logic" - if you kill enough innocent people then the survivors will like you.

We must most certainly regret all collateral damage in the war against terrorism, but we must recognise that it is the terrorists' actions that force our hand.

In the fight against Evil, it is always regrettable that there will inevitably be collateral damage.
 
100,000 collateral damage is accepatable to you...which includes children, old, women...who had nothing to do with anything that saddam or for that matter US stands for...they just expected their 'daily bread'.....

18 US soldier's death prompted you to write so emotively..???

Talk about being blinkered....I think horses have better vision even blinkered..!!!
 
If we step back from all this emotive rhetoric.......

There is this thing called a TROLL.
A person, or persons, who deliberately make provocative statements in order to encourage responses.
I wonder is this TraderPattern, actually isnt a trader, has no real knowledge, but writes emotive rhetoric merely to elicit responses from us.
The measure of the success of a TROLL is the number of responses, and his/her/its ability to generate friction, and to be divisive.

There are surely many other boards where such views and opinions can be registered.

This is a board to assist beginner traders to learn the game, intermediate traders to become better, and highly successful traders to be accused of not being as good as they are :)
 
Yes, lets step back from the emotive rhetoric and support the soldiers.

It is pointless debating with the blinkered liberals who care not for global security against Evil.

Support our soldiers, and don't be blinkered by the likes of trendie, who are trolls.
 
This is a board to assist beginner traders to learn the game, intermediate traders to become better, and highly successful traders to be accused of not being as good as they are

Brilliant! That really does sum up this board very neatly!
 
Iraq

pattern trader......

if tony bliar (not a spelling mistake) and the idiot in the white house are going to be consistent in ridding the world of tyrants who kill their own people when are we going to invade zimbabwe to free the people of that country from the murderer mugabe?

i know a soldier who has done a tour of duty in iraq and i can tell you he and his mates couldnt give a flying f*** whether or not they have the support of the british people.......the soldiers just do their job and dont need sycophants.........





TraderPattern said:
Yes, lets step back from the emotive rhetoric and support the soldiers.

It is pointless debating with the blinkered liberals who care not for global security against Evil.

Support our soldiers, and don't be blinkered by the likes of trendie, who are trolls.
 
hmm Never forget gentlemen we need "Bush" although Freud might of argued that its just a matter of personal choice. But the need to beat about the "Bush" so to speak ,is a deep routed .

President Bush However (please rise for the national athem, derrr de derrr derr derr derrrrr, ohhh bombs bursting in air etc. etc.) as he told the citizens of that great n free nation , are best off with a leader who will not hesitate to pull the trigger when he or his back room boys deicde its in the best interest of promoting planetary peace for mankind.

Its a great tradegy that lives are ended short on all sides in order to work towards obtaining this objective but if no party can change their beliefs within then there is no choice but to force the opinion until the victor? (no winners really) remains.

pay per view in the war zones is doable gentlemen.
god bless america.

jd
 
Bush

bush couldnt give a damn about the world.....hence no invasion of zimbabwe to bring democracy there......all he wants is for the usa to have a ready supply of oil when the S*** hits the fan in saudi.......oh and some work for scumbag cheney's old company halliburton......

how can anybody take seriously a country who has rumsfeld as its secretary of state for defence, the man who brokered the sale of chemical weapons technology to saddam and actually shook his hand in the reagan era?.......

the people of the us dont care about the world......most of them dont know where iraq is (and dont care about their ignorance of the outside world)......their tv is scared to be controversial and tell the truth for fear of losing the advertising revenues of big business hence one ignorant nation......






jsd said:
hmm Never forget gentlemen we need "Bush" although Freud might of argued that its just a matter of personal choice. But the need to beat about the "Bush" so to speak ,is a deep routed .

President Bush However (please rise for the national athem, derrr de derrr derr derr derrrrr, ohhh bombs bursting in air etc. etc.) as he told the citizens of that great n free nation , are best off with a leader who will not hesitate to pull the trigger when he or his back room boys deicde its in the best interest of promoting planetary peace for mankind.

Its a great tradegy that lives are ended short on all sides in order to work towards obtaining this objective but if no party can change their beliefs within then there is no choice but to force the opinion until the victor? (no winners really) remains.

pay per view in the war zones is doable gentlemen.
god bless america.

jd
 
We perhaps must not blame developing countries too harshly at this point, they can be likended to naughty children being reared without responsible parents, Bush is possibly just the fatherly hand of responsibility delivering a "clip round the ear" and sure he may pinch a few sweets.... who hasn't ?

jd

Unlawful to smack naughty children who give the finger..... ? how rediculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top