ronblack said:Has anyone done any forward tests of the patterns generated by APS?
dmilong said:Conclusion: the more patterns that show up in a scan the higher the probability of the signal hitting its preset target.
Jamy said:Hi,
check out www.tradingbasis.com
They offer much more tools. The website looks better. i have not tested the APS tools but i have purchased the tradingbasis tools and i am happy so far
Jamy
Pat494 said:An interesting snippet from last night's radio4 was that Man the biggest hedge fund in the world worth £50 billion, has been using a computerised black box system to make their trades since the 1980s. It displaced their commodity traders.
Pat494 said:Are you still happy with tradingbasis ? Please could you say why you think it is so good.
Thx
An interesting snippet from last night's radio4 was that Man the biggest hedge fund in the world worth £50 billion, has been using a computerised black box system to make their trades since the 1980s. It displaced their commodity traders
dmilong said:I think so Ron. I'm working on an algorithm that calculates the probability of a winner at any given time based on the frequency and number of generated patterns by APS. It isn't the Holy Grail but I'm sure it'll get close enough.
Jim
dmilong said:Initial results for S&P 500 futures tell me that a good number of patterns pass the forward test. Jim
Pat494 said:Hi Jim,
I see you are testing the program out on the S&P 500. Please could you say about how often does the program throw up a buy/sell signal on say <3 consecutive losers. Would it be about 1 a month or 1 a week perhaps ? and is the profitable trade ratio about 70% ( as per the sales blurb ) ?
Pat494 said:Finally figured out the data bit. Now for the rest !