I got semiautomated trading tools , they work faster than I , that is only to get better
fills , but the entrys I do by the hand , because it depends on so many things ,
if I would write a programm , it will be too long and it will not work .....
I know a great programmer , he sell automates for trading , but he must stand by
the computer and take care , what he do .
No system works perfect and the EA `s you can buy for 100-350$ are not for normal
use . You must be a programmer to let them run . They need settings and control.
So it is for me the question : what takes more time , to trade or to calibrate ?
Is the performance better with the automat ?
I say no , because the only thing I need is the stoploss , takeprofit is better done by
hand , when the move ending .
Yes I can testify ,I use them but I am not going to testify with proof or disclose the system.
Systems known to the masses stop working eventually, because demand at systems's entry/exit point will be increased by the masses and big instituitions trading it.This excess demand will leave the original system developer bidding at several bars disadvantage, eventually the masses start bidding several bars higher and the systems start failing.
Develop your own unique automated method and keep it to yourselves.