P
postman
http://www.spread-betting.com/trading-faqs/spreadbetting-tax-free
Let’s assume that you earned £50, at the weekend, stacking shelves in Tesco but, traded 12 hours a day during the normal working week. Your profits, from trading, amounted to approximately £5,000 per week and you made 10 trades each day; what would HMRC consider to be your primary occupation and income source?
The shelf stacking in Tesco’s? Unlikely, I think…
Although I can understand both facets of the argument I’m not sure that the ethical standard could be used in a case which went as far as court. So long as the person in question could show that he / she was following the law then they wouldn’t have a case to answer. As far as I know there is nothing in law which states that someone must ‘pay’ income tax – instead the law requires that someone is ‘assessed’ for income tax – an assessment doesn’t mean that liability is always found.
Anyway, it seems the consensus seems to be that spread betting gains are tax free and in most cases you won’t ever be confronted by the Inland Revenue about not declaring it and frankly if you are confronted you probably stand a good chance of winning due to a little thing called ‘law’. Secondly, if the Inland Revenue were to starting considering gamblers for taxation via Income Tax then they’d have no option but to offer relief on losses. Since there is nothing to stop people having more than one business or trade anyone who gambled would thus be able to deduct losses (from gambling) from their taxable income. This would cost the Inland Revenue a fortune.
“Remember that TAX will be the single biggest cost in your life. Earn a tax-free income trading the financial markets. Start Spread Betting Today!”
Let’s assume that you earned £50, at the weekend, stacking shelves in Tesco but, traded 12 hours a day during the normal working week. Your profits, from trading, amounted to approximately £5,000 per week and you made 10 trades each day; what would HMRC consider to be your primary occupation and income source?
The shelf stacking in Tesco’s? Unlikely, I think…
Although I can understand both facets of the argument I’m not sure that the ethical standard could be used in a case which went as far as court. So long as the person in question could show that he / she was following the law then they wouldn’t have a case to answer. As far as I know there is nothing in law which states that someone must ‘pay’ income tax – instead the law requires that someone is ‘assessed’ for income tax – an assessment doesn’t mean that liability is always found.
Anyway, it seems the consensus seems to be that spread betting gains are tax free and in most cases you won’t ever be confronted by the Inland Revenue about not declaring it and frankly if you are confronted you probably stand a good chance of winning due to a little thing called ‘law’. Secondly, if the Inland Revenue were to starting considering gamblers for taxation via Income Tax then they’d have no option but to offer relief on losses. Since there is nothing to stop people having more than one business or trade anyone who gambled would thus be able to deduct losses (from gambling) from their taxable income. This would cost the Inland Revenue a fortune.
“Remember that TAX will be the single biggest cost in your life. Earn a tax-free income trading the financial markets. Start Spread Betting Today!”