I have some questions to those of you who subscribe to the view that HMRC won't tax spread betting income if the trader concerned has another form of income . . .
1. What constitutes another income and how big does it need to be - is there a minimum?
2. Must it exceed the income generated from spread betting profits - or will any other income of any size suffice?
3. If a trader's spread betting profits are, say £10,000 and their other income produces £10,001 - does that then mean their spread betting profits will be tax free?
4. Conversely, if their other income only produces £9,999 - does that then mean their spread betting profits will be taxed?
5. What if the trader makes a profit one year - and pays tax accordingly - but makes a loss the following year. Will s/he be able to offset the losses against tax?
The notion that HMRC just make this stuff up as they go along, chopping and changing to suit themselves is one that, personally, I really struggle with. If anyone can provide some solid evidence - as in a HMRC document that details all the above - that would be very helpful and would put an end to this discussion once and for all.
Tim.
Hi Tim
I have moved this post over to this thread as its the one you would prefer I stay on - and that's no problem.
Ok you have asked more questions and they are all easy to answer.
The first point - life is rarely black or white - right or wrong - yes or no - in most areas of life there are "grey" areas.
There are lots of grey areas in the UK taxation system - that's why we have legal tax avoidance methods that get around many of the normal taxation rules and regulations and have been doing for many years.
After 2008 the HMRC finally woke up and became "streetwise" after realising so many of their ex employees had jumped shop and end up working for accountancy groups - advising ways of getting around the rules and regulations.
So the answer - the one many companies use and certainly would be the advice of companies like Goldmans or Mckinsey consultants would be - wake up and play smart!!
You do this by having "grey areas " in the rules and regulations - so that the guys who then exploit them can be trapped by basically other methods - a classic most recently on Starbucks and their tax affairs - you catch the punter out - in Starbucks case by dropping it out to the media. Jimmy Carr - another example.
Its a classic business game played by all and sundry.
In the spreadbetting case - as you would suspect - the majority of spreadbetters will never ever have to pay tax - I agree with that.
But the clever so and so's who might be playing their own game and trying to find a way of not paying ten's of thousands of tax on larger earnings - then they are not going to get away with it - and quite rightly they should not be allowed to
So as the HMRC after 2008 started to frighten a few punters - me included - they use subtle clever method to win their cases with out them every going to court.
Again - finally the HMRC are waking up in the real world and playing business people at their own game.
Please Tim - ask any spreadbetting company you want to - why they advice their clients to check their own tax situation out. In maybe 90% of cases - they will not have to pay tax because - 75% of all spreadbetters lose over a year anyway and what 90% are not full time paying no other taxes from other income.
This is why the industry regulators still allow this message of spread betting being tax free in the UK to still stand. For the vast majority - it is.
But why do you think the spreadbetting companies have been adding more small print to their own T & C's over the last 5 -7 years ??
That's a fact - please check it out
Regards
F