Dick Lexic
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,954
- Likes
- 124
i've got a conflict of signals ...the downside is 5900 cash..with 940's permission of course
Please forgive me for posting this chart because I’ve always thought that Fibonacci is so much stuff and nonsense. But I’ll never close my mind to something that might make me money. Today I made 8 points, which is better than a loss. I wanted to predict a price of 5940 but chickened out when it turned up at 5945 (4:30pm’ish). But the movement is still strong now, so I’ll predict a 5927 before close. Rubbish probably.
Jimi
Split - Where did you close your long from the first hour? I closed at 48 at the top of the channel on the 5 min chart. I didn't expect a blow off top. I did go short at 58 but only hung on for a few points. Difficult to tell what to do when that happens, but I will make a note of what to do on a blow off top for next time.
Someone asked me, I think Martin or Split, if my '(simple) automated rule-based system' worked better on certain days of the week. The answer is No.
I looked at the 'day of the week' analysis of profits and losses by quarter for 2011 & 2012. (The system makes several trades per day).
It would have been nice if one day of the week always generated losses because the remedy would be: don't work Wednesdays, or Monday and Fridays, or whatever.
The analysis is NOT statistically significant and there are dozens of other things to consider, but I'll not be following it up. If certain days of the week exhibited certain behaviours, then it would be common knowledge. But that's not the point at all, is it? It's whether my system with specific parameter values has day of the week bias. Of course, it would be possible to optimise the parameters to give the result I wanted, but that's the problem with optimisation. What is needed is a 'robust set of parameters' that are not 'specific event' dependant. Some of you guys have been asking about the Turtle book, well it goes into similar ideas in some detail.
Like you, I’m waiting for something to happen today, so I’ll just chat for a while. Read it if you want, or not. I can give you my guesses for what might happen, but that's all they are. The past, however, I can describe in great detail. Yesterday the high of 5990 was tested 3 times a 9:20, 11:00 and 2pm. Then the price dropped below the previous low of 5970 at about 3pm. (Times and prices are approximate). When prices test a level 3 times and give up, there’s likely to be a strong movement in the opposite direction. Isn’t there? Yesterday and today a low of 5932 has been tested and today we have what looks like a head and shoulders. There could still be a decent move today. I think it’s going to be Up … Watch it go down!
My prediction was correct!
i.e. the price went in the oppostie direction to what I predicted.
I'm nothing is not consistent.
I'm now short and very pleased, thank you.
Why am I short? Because the last Zigzag box had a net movement of 8 points.
Nice work.
Are you on MT4?
No, it's FXCM's 'Strategy Trader'. It seems that their intention is to stop supporting the platform and replace it with MT4. Sad.
Just for interest's sake FTSE has its weakest day of the year yesterday in comparison to DOW at -65 by the close (4:30) - ie: should have closed up at 6010 on the cash had it kept pace with dow.
It's continued in the same vein today and is currently a further -28 weak. Seems it's itching to go down and only holding where it is by the DOW - and then very reluctantly.
needless to say, I'm long ftse/short dow from early on and well underwater atm 🙂
jon - the ftse has been incredibly weak these last two days. I dont know which componet is causing it, or if it's just an options trader protecting his position. It should all get back to normal on monday.
Just to add to that. It was weak leading up to the FOMC statement. Then after that the DOW has rocketed, with a brief drop after the failed stress test news which was very short lived.
Jon, we have been weak all year, but as this was an extreme move, have you got any data to support some sort of correction?